Philosophy of Process Improvement: Today’s CFO Focusing on Operations

There are a great many methodologies and approaches to “making businesses better” through process improvement. From SixSigma to Continuous Process Improvement to Total Quality Management – all describe methods of measuring performance and outcomes to return intelligence oriented towards improvement. Many of these approaches are generally applied in manufacturing businesses, because in manufacturing it’s easier to see where processes may be flawed because the process works with tangible elements. Making corrections in a process can improve the performance of that process by reducing errors or increasing efficiency. The truth of the matter is that every business is like a manufacturing business, and applying measurements to the various processes the business performs can reveal the secrets to improving not only process performance and product quality, but resultant profitability.

A recent article on CFO.com titled Operations Take Center Stage, author David McCann discusses how some CFOs are improving business profitability and performance by delving deeper into operational areas of the business, and not remaining focused squarely on accounting and finance issues.

“Operations is the key to everything,” says Larry Litowitz, finance chief at SECNAP Network Security, a secure Internet-services provider. “That orientation is found most at manufacturers, but it should be at every company.”

Fiscal and financial matters are important to every business, but focusing on accounting for the end-result of business activities assumes that the work leading to the result is useful and effective. As more attention is paid to conservation of cash, reduction of expenses, and overall profit improvement, CFOs are necessarily moving deeper into the operational aspects of the business to uncover potential not previously addressed. In some cases, the move is more a function of self-defense and necessity than desire, as businesses increasingly compress spending on management, merging the functional roles of CIO, COO and CFO.

Increasingly, CFOs may find themselves taking on operational tasks whether they want to or not. At larger companies, the steady waning of the chief operating officer position has resulted in more operational responsibility for CFOs, recruiters say. In 2000, 47% of the 669 companies included in either the Fortune 500 or S&P 500 had COOs; in 2012, only 35% did, according to executive-recruiting firm Crist Kolder’s 2012 “Volatility Report of America’s Leading Companies.”

Some accounting professionals may believe that they don’t have the skills and experience to suggest changes in operational areas of their client businesses. I would suggest that logic and reason are generally the prevailing factors supporting process improvement – reasoning that is often developed through simple observation. Taking the time to understand what the business is doing at each level, and then actually observing those activities and accounting for their effectiveness and error rate, is how professionals can spend quality time in the business and uncover hidden profit potential.

Litowitz says CFOs can influence operations at a range of companies, including service-oriented businesses. “It’s really no different. The work is a set of activities,” he insists… “All these activities can be analyzed, controlled, and measured against a predetermined standard,” says Litowitz. And just as on a manufacturing floor, efficiency generates profit, justifying the CFO’s involvement.

Make Sense?

Joanie Mann Bunny Feet J