information technology costs – Cooper Mann Consulting

June 24, 2014November 29, 2017

Justifying the IT Budget: the Cost of Not Spending

“Competitive and ever-increasingly sophisticated in the marketplace”[1] describes a company positioned for long term business survival. Complacency takes the business nowhere but into irrelevance-land, which I think we can all agree is not where most business owners wish to end up… it makes selling the company slightly more challenging. Even in markets which were once firmly held to be localized are now open to new – and new kinds of – competitors, due in most part to advancements the development of information technology (IT) as well as how it is applied. These days, competition is globally facilitated rather than locally, and it’s becoming the standard approach. Welcome to the cloud.

New paradigms in IT capability and use are spawning huge shifts in what were broadly recognized normal or traditional business approaches. This realization has created the need for businesses to radically change their view of IT investment and the value of IT within the organization and operation. Yet IT is rarely an area which gains a strategic focus for investment within most businesses, and is frequently considered to be like a pencil or a particular chair… something the business needs but which has little impact on the company’s ability to compete better. Au Contraire, Mon Frère: Information technology is at the heart of business competitiveness, but justifying the desired investment is the great challenge. Maybe it’s because the focus is always on the great benefits to be achieved with the spend, rather than looking realistically at the impact of not doing it well or at all. Especially with information technology, there is a large potential cost to be paid for not spending adequately.

While business operations are sustained through IT involvement, economic pressures continue to weigh down business interest in funding IT operations. (which is weird, as there is a lot of evidence that the good bet is on those who do just the opposite). This regular spending reduction and cost control plan has good intentions of reducing the overall cost of business operations. The unfortunate reality is that operations are less efficiently sustained and are even more frequently unable to create or manage any level of growth. Reducing all IT spending is only useful when profitability is also improved and quality is maintained, unless it is an effort to simply stay afloat as revenues decline (and it’s recognized that quality will decline as well). But reducing costs does not help the business seeking to remain competitive in a rapidly changing marketplace, and pulling the pins out of the department primarily responsible for at least keeping things currently in operation operating serves only to chip away at the once-solid foundation. It’s a real problem, this difficulty with increasing interest and justifying increased funding for business information technology. And it all stems from the inability of organizations to clearly and with tangible benefit cost justify the investment.

It is this justification – demonstrating IT investment as a strategic asset presenting an advantage over competitors and positioning the business for future success – which requires effort and analysis to fully describe. Information technology is not a set of servers and software, and it is not websites and portals. It’s not click thru rates or SEO scores. Well, it’s all of that, but it is none of that. There is so much to consider and incorporate, and there are many degrees of success which might be experienced along the way. Information technology is a fundamental requirement in each and every business, and dependency upon it is increasing at a startlingly rapid pace, yet we still can’t quite figure out how to put it all on paper with provable numbers.

It might be easier to forecast in little departmental or functional pieces, but that doesn’t provide a total picture of the enterprise. And it’s often really difficult to quantify the impact of not doing something, or doing it only OK rather than really well. When this data does present itself, it often comes too late and in the form of a comparison to the competition, revealing where the business just didn’t meet the mark as compared to others in the same space.

It all boils down to businesses coming to the realization that information technology investment must be made on a continuing basis. The justification for IT funding must be made, and that justification must necessarily be balanced against the potential implications and impacts of not implementing. This is the only formula which can ultimately describe the value of IT investment in the business.

Make Sense?

Read the entire article on LinkedIn

https://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20140624161243-633314-justifying-the-it-budget-the-cost-of-not-spending

[1] A model for investment justification in information

technology projects: A. Gunasekaran et al. / International Journal of Information Management 21 (2001) 349–364

May 9, 2013September 25, 2018

What’s Motivating Small Businesses to Move to the Cloud?

When information technology professionals tell their small business clients about cloud computing, it often sounds even more complicated, risky and expensive than in-house networks and business Internet access once did. Business owners are faced with discussions about hosted or SaaS or hybrid and ask what will I do when the Internet goes out? and how secure is it? and will it work with my iPad?… and often get one of two responses from their local IT guy:

The cloud is just a way for software companies to make more money. I can keep your IT running better in your office and save you a lot.
If you move to the cloud you have to do a lot to make sure it is secure, and you won’t be able to run all your applications (but we’ll back up your data to the cloud so it’s safe).

Now, you can’t really blame the local IT guy for being a little bit wary of some cloud solution offerings because these local IT guys really are (in many cases) trying to operate with the best interest of their client in mind. It’s just unfortunate that sometimes a lack of information causes them to revert to their comfort zone, which is selling servers and performing on-site installation and break-fix work. What information are these folks lacking? An understanding of the various options and capabilities available with hosting services and cloud solutions, and how the IT provider can continue to be the advocate and IT manager for their clients even as those clients move their primary information technology to the cloud.

For many years business owners have relied upon their trusted local IT professional to help them find solutions to various business problems. Answering questions and helping procure and implement computers and networked systems, software applications, backup solutions and more, the IT professional serving a small business customer base has necessarily become the one-stop-shop for everything related to computers. Smaller IT service companies often rely upon regular sales of server equipment and network installations to pay their bills. It’s no wonder that these companies have a hard time accepting hosted solution models, as they see their revenue potentials dwindling as fewer servers and networks are sold to small businesses.

The interesting trend being viewed these days is that more business owners are looking beyond their IT professional to find solutions to the problems they deem as high priority for business technology: mobility and remote access. It is not necessarily that the self-service technology model makes more sense for small businesses (businesses can still benefit tremendously by getting training and implementation support from their local IT guy), but simple and affordable cloud solutions have addressed many of the small business IT challenges that were previously big revenue streams for local IT service providers. Savvy business owners will find solutions that work for them, and will look beyond their immediate advisors if those advisors aren’t providing the right answers.

When a small business owner talks about mobility and is looking for answers to the remote access question, they are not thinking about GoToMyPC or other remote control technologies and simply connecting to an office PC. Small business owners today are talking about central access to information at any time from any place and with whatever computing device they happen to have available at the time. For a small business owner, the benefit of the cloud is a largely emotional benefit – being able to stay in touch with the business at all times. The real benefits may be improved security, simplified management of information resources and pay-as-you-go pricing for business applications, but these are often value statements which fall on deaf ears just as the cost/benefits of upgrading the server every 2 years did.

It is tempting to focus on logic and reason, discussing the tangible benefits of any business information technology model or approach rather than how it makes us “feel”. Productivity metrics, best practices in security, total cost of ownership… these are all the right areas to pay attention to when selecting any technology solution for a business. But really, when it comes to selecting technology for small businesses, the business owner is in the driver’s seat, and that owner wants one thing: to see what’s going on all the time.

Make Sense?

Joanie Mann Bunny Feet J

May 2, 2013June 13, 2017

Moving to the Cloud While Retaining Your Investment in People, Process and Business Knowledge

cloud-business When businesses consider moving their information technology to the “cloud”, the problem is often approached with a thought that things will have to change dramatically in order to achieve a fully online working model. In many cases, business owners are left believing that any business use of cloud technologies is the equivalent of changing software and systems over to SaaS solutions, enabling the much-desired anytime/anywhere working model. What too many businesses aren’t being told is that there are a variety of ways to move to the cloud, and changing software and systems isn’t necessarily a prerequisite.

The benefits of a cloud computing model are many, with mobility and managed service being the most obvious. Less evident are the potential cost savings, because the subscription approach to paying for IT services may, on the surface, look like an equivalent or even higher cost over time. What isn’t being factored in to the cost (savings?) is the potential to improve processes and increase productivity. These benefits are often achieved simply due to a centralized management and access approach, and are not necessarily attributable to the adoption of new software tools.

For many businesses, the cloud is the right answer for deploying and managing IT and should be considered first, before changing out the software and tools in use throughout the organization. This approach has been widely adopted by businesses using Microsoft Exchange messaging solutions, where in-house Exchange servers are being replaced by outsourced Exchange providers and users experience the same functionality but with far better uptime and protection. The same approach is working for businesses electing to move their in-house business software and systems to the cloud, engaging with application hosting providers to install and manage existing desktop and network applications and to secure business data on the host. Users are able to access their native desktop applications via the cloud, allowing businesses to retain their investments in people, processes, and business knowledge.

Purists may contend that hosting of desktop applications is not truly “cloud”, but the terminology is far less important than the benefits businesses can achieve with a hosted application approach. For most folks, the “cloud” refers to Internet-based solutions and software delivered as a subscription service. When desktop applications are deployed on remote servers and the environment is managed and protected by the service provider, it is pretty much a cloud solution.

Particularly as Microsoft and others continue to move away from packaged all-inclusive solutions for local installation, small businesses are finding that the cloud, hosted applications and remote access provide the answers to a variety of business IT problems. Even more, those answers are being provided affordably, with a simplicity of setup not previously available, and with higher levels of service than was reasonably available with localized IT.

Information technology professionals at all levels are now recognizing that their small business and enterprise clients can experience many benefits with a cloud hosted and managed IT approach. It doesn’t take a comprehensive application or process overhaul to begin improving internal IT operations for the business. It makes no sense for a business to give up investments in training, process development, and people knowledge in exchange for a centrally managed and remotely accessible system. Rather, the smart business takes the steps to solve the real issues of IT management and mobility while allowing users to continue performing their tasks and doing business as usual – only better because the IT is now working for them.

Make sense?

March 4, 2013July 19, 2018

Helping a Small Business Customer Choose Your Solution

In a previous article entitled The Psychology of Small Business IT Adoption, I discussed Icek Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behavior and how a number of researchers applied it to the process of small business IT adoption. The concept, which ended up proving to be true, was that IT adoption by small businesses is a function of a number of fairly well-defined elements, and is not so much defined by specific types of businesses or the business leaders. The elements which lead to the act of business IT adoption (as well as adoption of other services, I’ll bet) can be identified and addressed by the potential provider of the product or solution ahead of time, making the possibility of actual adoption much greater.

Knowing how your prospective customer will approach the decision-making process is important, and getting a little insight ahead of time never hurts. Particularly when a lot of customers don’t actually reveal their thinking, it can be tough to know where to begin. You’ve been there before – you’re making your pitch and asking questions, but are getting nothing in return. Sometimes it’s “deer in headlights”, and they are simply overwhelmed. Other times they’re thinking about things you’re not telling them… but they’re not letting you know you’re not telling them. Dead air, and then a lost opportunity.

Boiling it all down to a fairly simple explanation, businesses adopt IT because there is a conscious plan to do so, and that plan is supported by a belief that the solution will do good things for the business, the solution is a recognized (if not expected) approach, and the business believes it has adequate resources and capability to effectively handle it. It’s all about:

Intent,
the attitude towards adoption,
belief of expected outcomes and their value,
expectations and the motivation to comply with them, and
evaluating barriers and the adequacy of resources to overcome them.

Intent

The first and most important element is intent, a conscious plan to get or do whatever it is. If the customer has no plan to get the item and sees no need for it, then the barrier is pretty high. However, if the need can be created, and the customer can be driven to believe they need to get the item, then there is intent. Now they’re looking for you and not vice versa. Consider that the Snuggie wasn’t “something” until folks were told that blankets simply weren’t good enough any more for lounging around (they don’t have sleeves!). Once people believed there was a problem, they pursued finding the solution.

The attitude towards adoption

Next, what’s their attitude towards getting the item? Sometimes people go looking for things they don’t think they can actually get, and often they know they need something but don’t think the solution is even out there, so they have a jaded viewpoint from the start. A prospect with a positive attitude and who wants to actually find a solution is far better to work with than one who has already determined that you can’t help them. Sometimes all it takes is a good listener to help create a positive attitude and make someone willing to tell you how you can help them.

Belief of expected outcomes and their value

Now, what does the customer think they will get from the deal? Will the solution actually solve problems or create new ones, and are the perceived problems to be solved big enough to really worry about in the first place? Small businesses tend to be very cash conscious, wanting as much value as possible for any expenditure. Further, most small businesses don’t let go of their cash easily and certainly not for frivolous purposes, so a successful sale is often supported by the customer’s belief that they will get a real solution and benefit – something of value which will be realized, and that is important enough to deal with sooner rather than later.

Expectations and the motivation to comply with them

It is interesting how many small businesses go shopping for products or solutions that they don’t actually intend to purchase or adopt. Sometimes they just want to be able to say “we’re looking in to it”, even if they aren’t and don’t plan to, and sometimes they have a business requirement that they don’t want to have to meet due to cost or complexity or whatever. Let’s say a business has customers complaining about unresponsive or bad support, and how they should have a ticketing system to help track issues better. Maybe the customers have the right idea: maybe the business should have a ticketing system (the business provides support and ticketing systems are considered a support service industry norm). This is the expectation. Let’s also say the business uses a CRM solution to handle support, and they believe it handles things just as well as a separate “ticketing” solution. Just because there is an expectation (customers want ticketing system), it doesn’t mean the business is motivated to comply (CRM does just fine). Expectations come in many forms and from many sources – customers, vendors, employees, contractors, the government and regulatory… on and on. Expectation and motivation to comply are both high when it comes to legal and regulatory issues, as these things can be tied directly to money and cash and risk. In other areas, it may not be as easy to identify or address. The best way to look at this issue is to try to understand what the business is doing now, whether the approach works or may be materially improved in servicing their business and model, and whether or not the business recognizes an immediate need to make the change.

Evaluating barriers and the adequacy of resources to overcome them

The final and perhaps most important factor in SMB adoption of IT is the simple belief that it can be done. Done at all, I mean, not just done “affordably”. My dad taught me that it’s not a bargain if you can’t afford it. Now, this doesn’t mean that there aren’t times when a business needs to bite the bullet and extend itself to become better. But any small business in this position is a tough sell, simply due to real resources and capability. No matter how much a business may know it needs something, if it really can’t do it, or believes it can’t – it won’t.

Make sense?

February 21, 2013March 31, 2017

The Psychology of Small Business IT Adoption

Convincing small business owners to adopt and apply technology in their businesses is often a difficult thing to do. While most business owners readily accept the need to have computer software to help them produce information and an email account to communicate with others, even such fundamental business solutions as a business website or computerized accounting system can be a hard sale.

Solution providers in every category are looking for ways to communicate the value of their products and services to businesses, and many do not consider that communicating value to a small business owner is not the same as communicating value to a larger and more established enterprise. There is research available which discusses why small businesses adopt IT, and how the importance (weight) of various factors change as the business grows. With small businesses fueling the economy and numbering far larger than their enterprise counterparts, it makes sense to understand just why small businesses buy. It’s also interesting to note that this research revealed that the different characteristics of firms and individual executives “did not have a unique effect on adoption decisions”. If the decision wasn’t impacted by characteristics of either the firm or individual executives, what does impact the decision?

An academic study by Icek Ajzen (Organizational behavior and human decision processes… University of Massachusetts at Amherst) discusses a theory called the Theory of Planned Behavior, and this theory was posed as a basis for predicting who would pursue a particular course of action or activity. The idea is that “intentions to perform behaviours of different kinds can be predicted with high accuracy”, and that the prediction is based on attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived control. Okay, but what does that really mean?

Intentions represent the strength of a person’s conscious plan to do something. So, when someone intends to do something, like adopt an IT product or service, it means that there is a strong positive plan in that person’s mind to accomplish the activity. However, having a plan in mind – no matter how strong or positive – is impacted by several elements: attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived control.

Attitude represents the belief that the activity will lead to a consequence that means something. If you have a plan to adopt an IT solution, but then develop a negative attitude towards the likely outcome (consequence) of using the solution, adoption isn’t likely to occur. On the other hand, if the belief is that the results or consequences of adopting and applying the solution will be useful, and deliver benefits in the areas intended, then the chances of deciding to make the purchase increase dramatically.

Another factor which weighs on the intent to do something is the pressure related to “subjective norms”, or what might be considered to be social factors. These factors exist in the firm, in the customer base, with partners, and within the market. As an example, it is an expectation that a business will have email addresses, computers, and other technology to support the business. This is simply a normal expectation of businesses today. It is also a requirement that businesses protect customer information, a requirement and normal practice from both a privacy and regulatory perspective. It is this expectation and the pressure to be “normal” (a motivation to comply) that also weighs on the decision to act and adopt.

The final factor is perceived control, which comes down to the person’s perception of how easy or difficult it will be to do what they’ve got in mind. Looking at various potential obstacles, and judging whether or not the business has the resources and capability to overcome them effectively, results in either a positive or negative impact on the intent.

All of these things are placed in linear order, and a straight line can easily be drawn as you move through the process. It’s all about:

Intent,
- the attitude towards adoption,
  - belief of expected outcomes and their value,
    - expectations and the motivation to comply with them, and
      - evaluating barriers and the adequacy of resources to overcome them.

Make sense?

February 13, 2013November 29, 2017

Turning to the IT Department When Times are Tough

When budgets get tight and the economic outlook is bleak, business owners and executives tend to turn to information technology departments and projects as a potential area for cost cutting. The reason for this is that many businesses view IT purely as a cost center, making it a prime target when driving to reduce operating costs. A survey by McKinsey & Company, however, reveals that the current trend is a bit different. While the survey is a bit dated, the information it contains is as relevant today as it was then.

The research indicated that many non-IT executives “seemed to have a developed a healthier appreciation for their information technology functions” according to Joe McKendrick in an older ZD Net article on the subject. McKendrick mentions that business executives generally seem pleased with the way the information technology is helping organizations get through these difficult economic times, “navigating the rough seas” as he put it.

“The survey also suggests that organizations that took the most advantage of information technology going into the downturn may have come out the strongest” observes McKendrick.

The McKinsey & Co Study, authored by Roger Roberts and Johnson Sikes, reported that the economic downturn actually increased awareness of the role information technology can play in improving business processes and reducing costs. As for the quality of services delivered? The study revealed that non-IT executives largely believe their IT functions responded effectively to the economic crisis. A majority said current performance in providing basic IT services is very or extremely effective. In contrast, IT executives had a dimmer view of their performance, with only a minority being satisfied with service delivery levels.

There have always been questions about the alignment of information technology to the business need, and IT is often perceived as being out of touch with the business. In this research, McKinsey & Co indicate that IT executives are very aware of the issues of keeping up with the business and are finding innovative ways of addressing them.

Make sense?

If you need assistance deciding how to get your applications and business online, or selecting and implementing with a service provider, we can help.