Tag: information technology

Posted on

Success in the Finance Department: Better Data and Analysis

Success in the Finance Department: Better Data and Analysis

CFOs and corporate controllers are beginning to recognize the increased value they can deliver to the organization when they take a more holistic and comprehensive approach to data reporting and analysis.  The key is in delegation of duties, and establishing the controls and connections which ensure proper (and complete) flow of information throughout the enterprise.  The finance department can easily become overburdened if not structured properly, but can be as easily undervalued if the sole focus is getting the numbers right.

An article on CFO.com discusses some of the elements of structuring the finance department for greater success, and identifies the value of taking a proactive, consultative and analytical approach to business finance.

“For a CFO, “success is not just about getting the numbers right, but also uncovering the story behind the numbers: taking raw accounting information and creating cogent and compelling management discussion and analysis,” says Eileen Kamerick, managing director and CFO at investment bank Houlihan Lokey.

Those who take the big picture into account are more likely to develop an organizational structure that isn’t merely reactive. That will allow staff to come up with more ideas and, ultimately, help drive revenue and run the business. “You have to create an organization so you aren’t in the engine all the time,” Kamerick notes.”


This is a great article… read the entire post on CFO.com here

You’ll find that it makes sense.

J

Posted on

The Cloud Makes Time Travel Possible: Hosted applications can deliver immediate business benefits

The Cloud Makes Time Travel Possible: Hosted applications can deliver immediate business benefits

In an article published on CIO.com, author Kevin Fogarty describes how moving to a cloud IT approach proved to be a highly beneficial and strategic decision for an on-site diesel fuel distributor.  The focus of the article was on how existing software and processes were enabled by centralizing them in a cloud hosting environment, and not by replacing them with new subscription-based applications.

For many businesses, this is the secret that nobody’s talking about: you can have the benefits of “the cloud” without having to radically change everything you have and everything you do.  Retention of knowledge assets is critical to business continuity, and moving existing systems and process to platforms where they can be leveraged to greater business advantage is a way to do that.  With centralization of systems and services, information can be processed far more efficiently than before, eliminating delays and improving cash flows dramatically.  Time is money, and the cloud helps businesses spend less of both.

“A lot of the invoices have to go out every day by certain times, so third-party accounting companies can do their thing for the fleet owners.” The setup sounds like a classic for any overhyped business-process-automation system, but Daniel Abrams and other Diesel Direct managers weren’t interested in managing their business using sophisticated business systems that require more motivation, money and technical staff than Abrams was willing to use or pay for.”

The initial benefit is being able to use the products already in place, just from a more secure and redundant location, but when you begin to consider the positive ramifications of reducing the time between delivery and invoicing, billing and payment receipt, or customer demand and product supply, you rapidly realize that the cloud means much more to the business than just another way to run software.

“Those changes save Diesel Direct both money and time. Rather than running reports and invoices all night Tuesdays, for example, the additional capacity lets the company run those resource-intensive processes during the day rather than overnight. That gets critical work done faster and more accurately than a process left to complete itself unattended.”

In short, the cloud makes time travel possible, because the result is available almost immediately upon completion of the task.  It’s kind of like getting your expense check as you walk off the plane in your home town, because you reported all your expenses in real time as they were incurred (snap a picture of the receipt at the bar, and like that).

Yet most business owners and IT managers for small and mid-sized businesses are being told that the cloud is best applied when innovation is required, and should be reserved for NEW things, and not thought of as a way to improve the status quo with existing or legacy architecture.

“It’s not unusual for mid-sized companies to come to depend on cloud services, according to James Staten, vice president and principal analyst for Forrester’s Infrastructure and Operations practice.

It is unusual for them to be more concerned with infrastructure than with applications, he says.”

With affordable and secure application hosting services being widely available for small and medium businesses, owners and managers no longer have to look to new solutions just to enable mobility, remote access, and a fundamentally stronger and better-managed system.  Legacy applications can be hosted and delivered, extending their useful life as well as the value of the development and intellectual property, and giving customers capabilities not readily available with local implementations.

“Diesel Direct can’t accomplish anything if its minimal IT infrastructure is offline for any length of time.

Abrams, worried about storms taking out his business as well as the power, didn’t know what technical solution he wanted until Callow “described for him what an enterprise infrastructure looked like,” Callow says.

“They didn’t need one, didn’t want one, but they did want the security, the reliability of a redundant IT infrastructure,” he says. “The most effective way to get that at the lowest possible cost is the cloud.”

Among the greatest benefits of outsourcing application delivery to a cloud hosting provider are the increased monitoring and security, application of best practices, and high levels of system fault tolerance and recovery capabilities offered.  While business subscribers focus on features and functionality of the application, the real focus for hosting providers is the platform – and the management and security of it.  This behind the scenes work offers tremendous business benefit to subscribing customers, but is often not the focus when discussing overall benefits of a cloud computing approach in the context of Software-as-a-Service, which is where many smbs focus their investigations.  As an alternative, businesses who may seek to adopt hosted solutions for their existing applications and software frequently do so for reasons of security and redundancy, not recognizing that their business processes may likely experience significant improvement, as well.

“Enterprises might have the luxury of making strategic decisions about cloud or other technology,” Golden says. “In mid-sized companies things are very tactical. No cloud evangelist is going around the refueling industry saying ‘there are ways to solve this problem.’ “Companies make tactical decisions to solve their own problems and, five or 10 years later, we’ll all wake up and realize we’ve changed the way we do everything,” Golden says.”

Make Sense?

J

The company in the article could be just like yours.  You don’t have to adopt new software and systems to benefit from the cloud.  How could your business change, if you could remove the problems of time and distance?

Posted on

Lessons Learned (or Not): Development and the Cloud

Lessons Learned (or Not): Development and the Cloud

Talk about agile technology and how great things are because we can experience rapid software solution development and deployment via the cloud is shining a brighter light on certain IT management issues which have existed for quite some time, but perhaps went largely unrecognized.  One of these issues is product development direction and influence, and where it really comes from.  If you think most IT companies determine their product lines and offerings from the top down, with detailed specifications supported by a strong business case, you may want to think again.  Based on my experience and that of a lot of other folks, there are many companies out there offering products and services  that were crafted in more of an ad hoc manner than through a focused “product development” effort with long term sustainability in mind.  In some cases, this demonstrates ingenuity and a desire to look at things in new ways.  Sometimes it’s just uncontrolled and unstructured chaos with dollar signs attached.

“there’s a school of thought, put forward by the small but influential analyst firm RedMonk, that developers now occupy the role of IT kingmakers. This theory holds that the traditional model of IT adoption, which assumes that major decisions emanate from the top, is wrong. Instead, the decisions that appear to come from a CIO are, in fact, dictated by the choices made by people way down in the IT organization-the traditionally denigrated developers. CIOs merely ratify the decisions made by “lowly” developers.”

It goes like this:  a high level concept comes from upper management… some “great idea”.  This high level idea is communicated (at a high level) to the production teams who will make it real.  The production teams decide what it really is, how it will really work, what it will look like, and how it will be offered – and all of this generally based on the preferences, skill sets, moral guidelines, belief systems, and work ethic of those involved in the development process.  The product details are run back up the food chain, where they then become the defining elements of the new solution.  In many cases, refinements and changes are argued against by the developers, citing various reasons or roadblocks to making changes to their prized construction.  But hey – they got it ready to go out the door, didn’t they?  So what if it’s not quite what you envisioned, and doesn’t necessarily represent a sustainable strategy?

Experience in business does count, particularly if you learn from it.  There is a saying I heard once, and I’m still not sure how I feel about it other than it proves to be so very true each and every day.  The saying is that “there is no morality without context”.  In business, context is often experience, understanding the cause and effect of an action or activity.  Without this learning, without the experience earned within the organization or by others, there is no context guiding the development.

“It’s irresistible to poke fun at some of the most egregious aspects of today’s IT practices-change control committees that only meet once every two weeks;ITIL implementations that place more emphasis on paper trails than actually, you know, getting things done; operations groups that resist application updates in the name of stability, and so on and so forth.

However, the fact is that these functions, if not their manifestation, exist for important reasons. Overlooking them-or outright ignoring them-is not the right solution. Ensuring that updates to production systems are made, and being able to track who makes changes to infrastructure, are enterprise functions are that won’t go away just because cloud computing is in the picture.”

Lessons previously learned will need to be learned again, and addressing problems after-the-fact is generally far more costly than being proactive and trying to avoid them in the first place.  It can be a very painful process, watching the company go through puberty all over again (particularly if it had once reached some level of maturity), yet this is what can occur when the bright and shiny new idea causes management to forget fundamental lessons previously learned.

In a recent article on Computerworld.com, author Bernard Golden makes a number of really good and interesting points about the opposing viewpoints of this “agile” development enabled by the cloud (the article focuses on AWS – Amazon Web Services, but it is completely relevant in the broader context).  Link here to access the entire post, it’s worth the read.

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9230040/How_the_Cloud_Brings_Developers_into_Business_Process

Make Sense?

J

Read more about legacy application modernization, and why IT and back-office outsourcing makes sense for a lot of reasons 

Posted on

Working With the Right Numbers: Financial Data Analysis Requires Accurate Financial Data

There is a lot of discussion these days about big data and financial data analysis.  One of the most valuable aspects of the available tools for performing financial analysis, forecasting and “what-if” scenarios is the ability for a business to benchmark their performance against other businesses in similar industries.  By comparing their performance metrics with other like businesses, an owner or manager may be able to identify items in the performance profile which could be improved or which may represent differentiation from competitors.

When speaking to accounting professionals about the additional valuable services they could be providing to clients by using these KPI reporting tools to identify additional consultation and advisory services clients need, the feedback I generally get from the professional is that “you have to get the numbers right, first”.  It seems that, even with the ready availability of powerful and affordable software solutions to run the business, accounting and finance still tends to be an afterthought for many business owners.  Relegated to the back-office, and being an after-the-fact recipient of transactional data, accounting is still viewed by many as a “necessary evil” of doing business rather than an area of potential strategic advantage.

Many accounting professionals are still struggling with finding the right approach to help clients get better financial reporting on a regular basis, in as near real time as possible, without having to practically live in the client systems.  These professionals are often still approaching the problem by attempting to get the client to participate in the financial systems directly by inputting checks and payments, creating invoices, and doing other types of work the client needs to perform – and using the accounting system to do it.

This approach may well be the source of the dilemma, and all because the client is being asked to work in the accountant’s software rather than with a solution which addresses specifically the tasks the business users need to perform on a regular basis.  When users have tools which don’t suit their requirements well, they tend to not use the tools properly, if at all.  When users are provided with tools suited specifically to solving their functional or process support problems (Service Oriented Architecture approach, or SOA – what Doug Sleeter calls “chunkify”), usage and accuracy can increase dramatically.  Getting the numbers right means getting the supporting solution right first. When these solutions are properly configured and deployed, data collection and integration can become a “stealth” process, silently passing information from one system to another, significantly improving the accuracy and quality of data.

Accounting professionals who focus on assisting their clients with applying the right solutions to support operational as well as accounting processes, and who help to create the controls around the appropriate flow of information end-to-end, are delivering very high levels of value to those client businesses.  It is the assistance these consultative professionals provide, helping the business facilitate its processes faster and more efficiently, which increases the accuracy and, ultimately, the meaning of the resulting financial data.

Make Sense?

J

Interested in learning more about tools which can help your professional practice get more opportunity from every client?  Contact me @JoanieMann on Twitter, or connect with me on LinkedIn or Facebook.

  • Read more about how accountants need business intelligence, too
  • Read more about how there’s no fear and loathing in accounting
  • Read more about the pressure on accountants to deliver more value and intelligence to their clients
  • Read more about Data Warriors: accounting in the cloud
Posted on

More Than an Accountant: A Trusted Business Advisor

More than an accountant: A Trusted Business Advisor

Accounting isn’t available for re-invention.  The rules were established long ago, and my debits and credits aren’t any better than yours.  Accurate accounting, completed tax returns, and quality audits are an expectation of every client of a professional accounting practice.  So, with accounting being somewhat of a “known quantity”, how does a firm show that it can do so much more than simply crunch the basic numbers, and demonstrate their value as a trusted business advisor? The answer is in knowing more about the client business and operation, and using that knowledge to identify opportunity for both the firm and for the client.

Accounting firms serving growing businesses must deliver value, insight, and long-term service to their clients.  These firms desire to enhance their service deliveries to existing clients and prospects, and need efficient and effective tools to support the effort.  For today’s accounting professional, that toolkit needs to include data collection, integration, and analysis.  The accounting professional’s participation in these areas is critical.  Data collection and integration efforts must be controlled in order to ensure accuracy of data in the financial systems.  This becomes the first and most important element – making certain that the data in the financial systems is accurate and complete.  Only then may additional steps be taken to add more value to the service delivery.

A primary method of adding value to accounting service delivery is to enhance the firm’s ability to provide data analysis and deep insight into business and financial performance.  This is, of course, enabled through the monitoring and control of data flowing into the financial systems, ensuring accuracy of information used for analysis. Staying abreast of changing financial needs and finding additional opportunities to add value to client deliveries is a key element in gaining new business and revenue for the firm, and adding to the “sticky” nature of the firm’s services.  Engaging with clients on key financial trends and industry performance metrics can help to set the firm apart from its competition, differentiating services and offering far more value to the client.

Financial analysis tools available today offer accounting professionals more capability and process support than ever before.  With direct integrations to practice management and engagement solutions, firms gain the ability to map and sync data automatically from core firm applications.  This ability can significantly improve upon the time and effort required to introduce data into the system, and delivers efficiency and scalability which allows the firm to easily expand use of the solution to the entire portfolio of client engagements.

There are numerous benchmarking and reporting tools today which make reading and understanding financial data easier and more accessible for business owners and managers, yet these solutions rarely address the needs of the firm in terms of mining the entire portfolio of clients for new opportunity where the firm can deliver more value and service.  The selection of the right tool for the firm becomes a key element in this respect.  The solution must deliver not only better analysis and reporting for each client, but should also be oriented to provide a system-wide view for the firm members and participants.

A key aspect to the efficient application of these tools is to systematize the activity, and structure it as a standard process within the business.  When it becomes part of a firms DNA, to structure, compare and analyze client engagements for trends and similarities and then to take advantage of the opportunities revealed therein, the firm has a practice model which speaks to sustainability and growth over time.  For smaller firms and solo practitioners, this approach is what turns individual accomplishment into a long-term business model.

The solution is out there, and it’s available today for practitioners who wish to introduce efficient and scalable ways to identify client opportunity, capture it, and deliver on it.  Turn your firm into a value machine, and deliver the trusted advice your clients need.  A little investment in this area can deliver large returns for years to come.

Make Sense?

J

Interested in learning more about tools which can help your professional practice get more opportunity from every client?  Contact me @JoanieMann on Twitter, or connect with me on LinkedIn or Facebook.

  • Read more about how accountants need business intelligence, too
  • Read more about how there’s no fear and loathing in accounting
  • Read more about the pressure on accountants to deliver more value and intelligence to their clients
  • Read more about Data Warriors: accounting in the cloud
Posted on

Data Dashboards and Financial Analysis: Comparing Apples to Aardvarks

It’s been said that the only constant is change.  Businesses are being told that having the strength and agility to meet those changes is what makes the difference between success and failure.   But in order to address change, to understand the possible outcomes in various “what-if” scenarios, a business has to understand how it is performing today, and then must capture and compare measurements over time to be able to identify trends and similarities.  Only then, when the business has the information necessary to view performance over time, is it then possible to introduce changes and forecast potential outcomes.  When the analysis includes many businesses rather than just one, even more may be revealed in terms of comparative performance levels under varying circumstances.

It doesn’t sound all that difficult, really.  Not on the surface, anyway.  There are a lot of tools and resources available now which make this type of analysis a walk in the park.  With accounting moving “online” and into connected web service, and with accounting professionals working closer than ever before with their online clientele, the data available is astounding and analytics providers are eating it up.  It’s actually possible for a small business to subscribe to a solution, upload or sync up their QuickBooks or similar financial information, and magically have a really cool dashboard to look at that makes financial statement reading obsolete.  More often than not, there’s also a feature that lets the owner compare or benchmark their performance against others in the same industry.  And that’s the problem.

Stepping back a bit, let’s now talk about XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language).  In its simplest form, XBRL can be described as an application of XML (eXtensible Markup Language) intended for use in business reporting.  The idea is that all financial reporting should be “marked” in certain standard ways, so that it is easier to compare and monitor.  XBRL is considered by many, including the AICPA, to be a “language for the electronic communication of business and financial data which is set to revolutionize business reporting around the world.” Even though it sounds logical enough, it hasn’t taken off as quickly as everyone thought.

So what does XBRL have to do with data dashboards and industry performance benchmark comparisons for those small businesses we discussed earlier?  They both suffer from the same dilemma, and that’s lack of consistency in definitions and taxonomy (categorization).

Because businesses have a lot of, um, flexibility when it comes to financial reporting, it is not unusual for the application of a single term to mean one thing to one company, and a very different thing to another.  As an example, what one company calls “operating revenues” may be what another business calls “net revenues”.   Does “inventory value” mean the same thing to a business using a FIFO costing method versus LIFO?

When you try to perform an analysis of the financial data of two companies who report or label their information differently, it makes it really difficult to trust the comparison because you may very well not be comparing the right things – apples to apples.  It may be more like apples to aardvarks. I can’t tell you that the solution is out there, because at this point I don’t think it is.  I say this because the problem starts where the data is created and initially “categorized”.  There are few standards, and even fewer that are actually implemented on any sort of broad basis.  The problem exists in the trial balance software, in the accounting products, and in those Excel spreadsheets everyone carries around with them.

The best, first step any accounting professional can take with their clients is to make every attempt to address the financial reporting in a standardized manner, and capture and categorize the data appropriately from the get-go.  It’s the only way you’ll avoid spending days with Excel spreadsheets and working papers, attempting to normalize client data into a framework that is available for a useful and trusted comparative analysis.

cropped-jmbunnyfeet1Make Sense?

J

Interested in learning more about tools which can help your professional practice get more opportunity from every client?  Contact me @JoanieMann on Twitter, or connect with me on LinkedIn or Facebook.

  • Read more about how accountants need business intelligence, too
  • Read more about how there’s no fear and loathing in accounting
  • Read more about the pressure on accountants to deliver more value and intelligence to their clients
  • Read more about Data Warriors: accounting in the cloud