improve profitability – Cooper Mann Consulting

EDI Helps Manufacturers Increase Efficiency and Improve Profitability

More efficient processes yield more revenue, it’s that simple. Imagine being able to seamlessly integrate data across the entire supply chain and then imagine how that integration could increase the efficiency and deliver more revenue to each link in the chain.

Every manufacturing CEO wants to increase operational efficiency and lower costs, helping to boost revenues and improve profitability. Yet there is an area which has often been overlooked by businesses, and this is the area of B2B integration. While some methods have delivered degrees of success, broad-based solutions remain elusive to many.

The problem is in the number and types of data sources a manufacturer deals with on a regular basis. With a network of partners and suppliers, each using their own data formats and transfer methods, the volume and variety of information flowing can be overwhelming. The result is siloed data, increased pressure on information technology and management resources, disconnected workflows and slower processes.

IDC’s Manufacturing Insights’ webcast IDC FutureScape: Worldwide Manufacturing Predictions once suggested that nearly 30% of manufacturers would make significant investments toward increasing visibility and analysis of information exchange and business processes, within the company and with partners. That was in 2015. Today, data integration and process improvements continue at a fevered pace as technology is helping businesses gain new data that brings new insight and sparks change.

The integration of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) is a fundamental first step in improving how a business works with trading partners as well as internally. EDI has been around for many years and refers to the transfer of structured data between two organizations or “trading partners” using a set of standards that define common information formats to facilitate the exchange. By adhering to the same standards, two different organizations can electronically exchange documents (POs, invoices, shipping notices etc), seamlessly and regardless of geographic location.

Simplifying business processes, reducing operating costs, increasing end-to-end visibility, reducing errors, and speeding up operations and responsiveness… these are the many benefits to be experienced when EDI and non-EDI information streams are processed in the same manner when it comes visibility, exception-handling, notifications, role-based access etc.

Unfortunately, not all trading partners use EDI (or implement it in the same manner). To get their documents into a usable format, manufacturers find themselves using manual processes or writing custom scripts. Either way, it means that documents are flowing through entirely different processes for EDI and non-EDI business partners, which significantly complicates matters and adds unexpected costs and complications. Addressing this is one of the reasons why modern manufacturers are finding an increased need for connecting with organizations like Mendelson Consulting who can help identify and address situations that out-of-the-box EDI does not.

The pressure is mounting for manufacturers to produce more with less resources. Mendelson Consulting understands what makes EDI complicated and has the experience and expertise to help growing enterprises overcome challenges in design and implementation, making broader integration possible and greater improvement achievable.

jm bunny feet Make Sense?

Philosophy of Process Improvement: Today’s CFO Focusing on Operations

There are a great many methodologies and approaches to “making businesses better” through process improvement. From SixSigma to Continuous Process Improvement to Total Quality Management – all describe methods of measuring performance and outcomes to return intelligence oriented towards improvement. Many of these approaches are generally applied in manufacturing businesses, because in manufacturing it’s easier to see where processes may be flawed because the process works with tangible elements. Making corrections in a process can improve the performance of that process by reducing errors or increasing efficiency. The truth of the matter is that every business is like a manufacturing business, and applying measurements to the various processes the business performs can reveal the secrets to improving not only process performance and product quality, but resultant profitability.

A recent article on CFO.com titled Operations Take Center Stage, author David McCann discusses how some CFOs are improving business profitability and performance by delving deeper into operational areas of the business, and not remaining focused squarely on accounting and finance issues.

“Operations is the key to everything,” says Larry Litowitz, finance chief at SECNAP Network Security, a secure Internet-services provider. “That orientation is found most at manufacturers, but it should be at every company.”

Fiscal and financial matters are important to every business, but focusing on accounting for the end-result of business activities assumes that the work leading to the result is useful and effective. As more attention is paid to conservation of cash, reduction of expenses, and overall profit improvement, CFOs are necessarily moving deeper into the operational aspects of the business to uncover potential not previously addressed. In some cases, the move is more a function of self-defense and necessity than desire, as businesses increasingly compress spending on management, merging the functional roles of CIO, COO and CFO.

Increasingly, CFOs may find themselves taking on operational tasks whether they want to or not. At larger companies, the steady waning of the chief operating officer position has resulted in more operational responsibility for CFOs, recruiters say. In 2000, 47% of the 669 companies included in either the Fortune 500 or S&P 500 had COOs; in 2012, only 35% did, according to executive-recruiting firm Crist Kolder’s 2012 “Volatility Report of America’s Leading Companies.”

Some accounting professionals may believe that they don’t have the skills and experience to suggest changes in operational areas of their client businesses. I would suggest that logic and reason are generally the prevailing factors supporting process improvement – reasoning that is often developed through simple observation. Taking the time to understand what the business is doing at each level, and then actually observing those activities and accounting for their effectiveness and error rate, is how professionals can spend quality time in the business and uncover hidden profit potential.

Litowitz says CFOs can influence operations at a range of companies, including service-oriented businesses. “It’s really no different. The work is a set of activities,” he insists… “All these activities can be analyzed, controlled, and measured against a predetermined standard,” says Litowitz. And just as on a manufacturing floor, efficiency generates profit, justifying the CFO’s involvement.

Make Sense?

Joanie Mann Bunny Feet J