Tag: cloud brokerage

Posted on

Lessons Learned (or Not): Development and the Cloud

Lessons Learned (or Not): Development and the Cloud

Talk about agile technology and how great things are because we can experience rapid software solution development and deployment via the cloud is shining a brighter light on certain IT management issues which have existed for quite some time, but perhaps went largely unrecognized.  One of these issues is product development direction and influence, and where it really comes from.  If you think most IT companies determine their product lines and offerings from the top down, with detailed specifications supported by a strong business case, you may want to think again.  Based on my experience and that of a lot of other folks, there are many companies out there offering products and services  that were crafted in more of an ad hoc manner than through a focused “product development” effort with long term sustainability in mind.  In some cases, this demonstrates ingenuity and a desire to look at things in new ways.  Sometimes it’s just uncontrolled and unstructured chaos with dollar signs attached.

“there’s a school of thought, put forward by the small but influential analyst firm RedMonk, that developers now occupy the role of IT kingmakers. This theory holds that the traditional model of IT adoption, which assumes that major decisions emanate from the top, is wrong. Instead, the decisions that appear to come from a CIO are, in fact, dictated by the choices made by people way down in the IT organization-the traditionally denigrated developers. CIOs merely ratify the decisions made by “lowly” developers.”

It goes like this:  a high level concept comes from upper management… some “great idea”.  This high level idea is communicated (at a high level) to the production teams who will make it real.  The production teams decide what it really is, how it will really work, what it will look like, and how it will be offered – and all of this generally based on the preferences, skill sets, moral guidelines, belief systems, and work ethic of those involved in the development process.  The product details are run back up the food chain, where they then become the defining elements of the new solution.  In many cases, refinements and changes are argued against by the developers, citing various reasons or roadblocks to making changes to their prized construction.  But hey – they got it ready to go out the door, didn’t they?  So what if it’s not quite what you envisioned, and doesn’t necessarily represent a sustainable strategy?

Experience in business does count, particularly if you learn from it.  There is a saying I heard once, and I’m still not sure how I feel about it other than it proves to be so very true each and every day.  The saying is that “there is no morality without context”.  In business, context is often experience, understanding the cause and effect of an action or activity.  Without this learning, without the experience earned within the organization or by others, there is no context guiding the development.

“It’s irresistible to poke fun at some of the most egregious aspects of today’s IT practices-change control committees that only meet once every two weeks;ITIL implementations that place more emphasis on paper trails than actually, you know, getting things done; operations groups that resist application updates in the name of stability, and so on and so forth.

However, the fact is that these functions, if not their manifestation, exist for important reasons. Overlooking them-or outright ignoring them-is not the right solution. Ensuring that updates to production systems are made, and being able to track who makes changes to infrastructure, are enterprise functions are that won’t go away just because cloud computing is in the picture.”

Lessons previously learned will need to be learned again, and addressing problems after-the-fact is generally far more costly than being proactive and trying to avoid them in the first place.  It can be a very painful process, watching the company go through puberty all over again (particularly if it had once reached some level of maturity), yet this is what can occur when the bright and shiny new idea causes management to forget fundamental lessons previously learned.

In a recent article on Computerworld.com, author Bernard Golden makes a number of really good and interesting points about the opposing viewpoints of this “agile” development enabled by the cloud (the article focuses on AWS – Amazon Web Services, but it is completely relevant in the broader context).  Link here to access the entire post, it’s worth the read.

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9230040/How_the_Cloud_Brings_Developers_into_Business_Process

Make Sense?

J

Read more about legacy application modernization, and why IT and back-office outsourcing makes sense for a lot of reasons 

Posted on

Is great customer service the entire customer experience?

Is great customer service the entire customer experience?

I’ve been working with accounting technologies for a long time, and much of that time and activity has been focused on online accounting models and solutions.  The Authorized Hosting Program for QuickBooks is a good example of the type of service model that’s garnered a lot of attention over the past couple of years, particularly since desktop QuickBooks editions continue to be the accounting solutions of choice for new and growing small businesses, even as those businesses look to leverage the cloud for remote and mobile access to business information.  But hosted QuickBooks delivery models vary tremendously from provider to provider, so how does an accounting professional or their client business owner know which service will suite them best?

At the surface, most of the QuickBooks hosting services available today look pretty much alike.  In concept, they are, but in reality the technology each provider elects to deploy makes a big difference in the experience of the hosted service user.  Some deployment models require a lot of 3rd party software to make the service work, and some providers have constructed their own “black box” technology to make the delivery possible.  The result is a wide variety of service models and delivery approaches, some of which may perform better or offer more functionality than others.  But these details are often difficult to discern when evaluating the various provider deliveries, so most folks simply resort to pricing comparisons.  Unfortunately, this isn’t really the best way to measure the quality of the provider or the service.  There’s still some truth to the old adage that “you get what you pay for”, even when a service has become commoditized in the market.  On the other hand, just because a service is more expensive doesn’t mean it is better.

It is often difficult to get prospective customers to see or understand the technical  nuances of any given hosted delivery, so many service providers are trying to find other ways to set themselves apart from the competition.  One approach that’s become quite popular is to tout the availability and quality of the customer service offered by the provider.  While I do believe that quality customer service should be available for subscribers at all times, I also recognize a bit of a problem with this marketing approach.

To illustrate the problem, I’ll describe a conversation I had with a hosted client last year.

This particular client was with an engineering firm, and the company was subscribing to hosting services for a variety of Microsoft applications, including MS Project (not that it matters, really).  Anyway, this client called me up one day just to chat about something that was frustrating him, and that was an issue of irregular system performance.  Sometimes it was really speedy, and sometimes things would slow down to a crawl and nobody seemed to know why.  He said that he and his team members had been regularly in contact with the support department, and that the support team was always cheerful, helpful, and willing to work with them to find out what the issue might be.  Unfortunately, they didn’t find anything, and suggested that the client continue to contact them when there was a problem.  This went on for quite a number of months, and the client continued to be frustrated with the service performance but quite pleased with the support response.  Then he told me a story.

He said that he used to have a Mercedes, and he loved that car.  It was beautiful and fun to drive, and yes, pretty expensive.  The car had frequent issues, and for this reason he got to know the guys at the Mercedes dealership really well.  He knew all of their names, and they knew his.  He even sent them Christmas cards every year.  He couldn’t have wished for a nicer group of people to service his vehicle.

Then he bought a Toyota.  He really liked this new car, too.  It was fun to drive, sporty, and a little more affordable than the Mercedes was.  This car didn’t need nearly as much maintenance as the previous one, and he had far fewer problems with it.  He never got to know the names of the guys in the service department at the Toyota dealership, because he didn’t go there very often.  When he did, the service was fast and courteous – pretty much what he expected.  But the best part was that he didn’t become closely acquainted with the dealership service team, because the car just worked.

You know those car commercials on TV, where the sales person is telling the customer about how great the warranty on the vehicle is?  Yeah – the one where the customer wants to know if they should buy a good car, or buy a car with a good warranty.  Makes you think, doesn’t it?

When you’re looking for a hosting service provider to deliver QuickBooks and other desktop software to you via the cloud, remember that great customer service is only part of the puzzle.   The best solution is the one that just works, and doesn’t leave you needing a lot of support.

Are you on a first name basis with your hosting support team?  You might want to think about why that is.

Make sense?

J

Read more about using the cloud to extend your access and collaboration beyond traditional boundaries.

Posted on

Is Cloud Ringing the Death Toll for ERP?

Is Cloud Ringing the Death Toll for ERP?  Nope.

Software developers are being forced to recognize the business benefits of cloud computing models, and must shift their thinking along with the demand.  ERP isn’t dead or dying.  It’s changing, and delivering new agility and capability to businesses of all sizes.  Developers are going to have to find ways to modernize and adapt old, large frameworks to address these new demands, or lose out to newer players.

“Cloud on its own doesn’t affect the validity of ERP. Businesses still require management software to help them run their organization effectively. What Cloud does do however, is level the playing field and make ERP solutions more accessible to the consumer. That means publishers and resellers need to pay attention.” 

an old ERP The Right Way! guest blog by Jason Carroll with contributions from Brett Beaubouef

Make Sense?

J

Read more about legacy application modernization, and why IT and back-office outsourcing makes sense for a lot of reasons 

Posted on

The race to find the “secret sauce” for hosted application services for small business

The race to find the “secret sauce” for hosted application services for small business

Cloud computing is here to stay.  What was once viewed as bleeding-edge technology fraught with peril and risk is now recognized as an emerging standard for application deployment and delivery.  The race to the clouds represents a significant challenge, however, when issues of application interoperability and integration are introduced – particularly when it comes to small business solutions which traditionally reside on the local PC and network.

Today’s available technologies and platforms quite nicely facilitate single application deliveries, yet frequently fail to address the dynamic provisioning and deployment requirements of a rich integrated application environment.  Users who desire to select from a variety of applications in a hosted environment are most often met with barriers which won’t allow them to have the particular mixture of solutions they need.

While virtualization approaches for platforms and applications are gaining popularity and increasing in capability, the reality of the problem still rests with the fact that, in order for the applications to integrate, they must be installed on the same machine.  There is a race amongst the virtualization platform providers to find the “secret sauce” of application hosting; to enabling a flexible, dynamic, rich application delivery method which overcomes the need to have integrated applications installed together on servers in pre-selected ‘packages’.  With the secret sauce, the provider would be able to offer the customer any possible combination of available applications, and offer them as fully integrated solutions, regardless of whether or not those applications were actually installed on a machine together somewhere.

Currently, the solution is addressed (sort of) in how the provider deals with three main elements in the service model, which are packaging, provisioning, and business rules.  With these three ingredients appropriately approached in a flexible infrastructure and partner network, the potential for broad hosted application delivery and distribution exists.   Service providers are still stuck with the requirement to pre-select their various partner or integrated application inclusions, but it is possible to offer the perception of maximum flexibility without actually having it.  The challenge is not presented with the business rules, but in the packaging and provisioning processes.

Packaging is the step where the item to be provisioned is combined with other elements, resulting in a service or installation “package”.  Much like a manufacturing assembly process, packaging takes into consideration the total resource utilization or requirement, accounting for all resources combined into or used to create the package.  Packaging cannot be performed without first understanding, at a detailed level, what can be provisioned and how.  With the variety of applications, data services, implementation methodologies and models which exist, a single method approach has proven to not address a majority of software products currently available on the SMB market, and is unlikely to in the near future.

An example of this challenge is partially revealed when we look at the diversity of applications involved in the Microsoft Office ecosystem.  Many businesses rely upon the functionality present on the Office suite desktop products, such as Word, Excel and PowerPoint.  For some application users, this functionality is not present in their primary use software, but is presented via desktop level integration methods.  In order to deliver the full functionality and capability of the primary use application, the installation and integration support for the Office applications must also be provisioned and packaged into the service.   Offering even limited integrations and options like Office for inclusion in the package can introduce challenges in data access and management, permissions and file level security, and ISV licensing of applications.  For these and other reasons, attempting to provide a rich, user-selected mixture of deliverables poses the ultimate challenge to the application service provider.

When a cloud or application hosting provider can offer their customers the ability to sign up for, purchase, and utilize without complication or delay their selections of desktop or web-based applications, services and integrations, and pay for them as a subscription service accessible at any time and from anywhere – that’s the secret sauce of application hosting and cloud IT that everyone’s looking for.

Make sense?

J

Posted on

The Cloud is Not the End of ERP

With the emergence and general acceptance of “cloud” technologies and services, many in the information technology industry have begun to wonder if the traditional approach to enterprise software – the ERP solution – is nearing its useful life.  Is this the end of ERP?  Well, the hype sometimes becomes the reality, and businesses are moving in droves to software-as-a-service to find the cost and efficiency benefits promoted in the sales materials, and they’re finding them.  Look at Sage’s acquisition of Intacct as an expression of increased focus on cloud-based solutions. This activity around the cloud and cloud-based software-as-a-service represents a major change in how people access and consume information technology and business services, a change that’s being driven by the huge momentum of the overall growth of “cloud”.  The market is moving to a customer-centric subscription model, where the legacy approach was more in tune with the “purchase it once and use it forever” mentality, and customer relationships were largely centered on upgrade cycles.

“As an economy and a culture, we are rapidly moving away from owning tangible goods and, instead, gravitating towards becoming members of services that provide us with experiences  – such as listening to a song, using a car, watching a movie or collaborating with our colleagues.

Of course, this cultural transformation has profound implications for business models. Why? Success is no longer gauged by counting how many units of your product you have sold. Rather, success is measuring how many customers are using your service on a recurring basis and how successful you are monetizing those recurring relationships.”

Forbes.com guest post written by Tien Tzuo http://www.forbes.com/sites/ciocentral/2012/02/09/the-end-of-erp/

While it sounds like the cloud is the right approach for everyone, looking at the variety of real business situations in the market suggests that, as always, one size does not fit all, and more “traditional” ERP solutions may well continue to be the right foundation for many enterprise operations.  Particularly when considering that many businesses already significant investments in platforms and infrastructure, software and data integrations, and operational process support, cloud software solutions may not provide the necessary functionality to support existing business.  Further, integrations that may be available and supported with legacy systems are often not available with cloud-based counterparts, while different integrations based on cloud standards may be present.

For smaller businesses and those in emerging markets, subscription-based IT models may make more sense, especially as popular traditional software makers have introduced their cloud-based counterparts which will likely incorporate the features or functionality of their legacy systems, while taking advantage of the capabilities introduced through cloud integration and interoperability standards.  Strong consideration should still be given to “traditional” ERP solutions, however, as there may be a level of stability, usability, or process support desirable by the business.

Utilizing these traditional ERP systems does not mean eliminating the potential for the business to benefit from cloud solutions.  Rather, cloud platforms and hosting solutions, as well as cloud-based integrations and extensions, are enabling mobility and collaboration around legacy systems, delivering cost and efficiency benefits just as significantly as those who have adopted a full-on “cloud” approach.

“It also makes sense to explore “edge” investments. […] there are significant innovation opportunities outside of core operations. Look to take advantage of the ERP platform’s capabilities in these spaces. Or implement low-cost, smaller-footprint solutions – even if on an exploratory basis. If they are fully adopted later, you can integrate them into the ERP backbone and expose standardized data and processes to the edge.”

from Deloitte’s Tech Trends 2011 report titled “the end of the “Death of ERP” 

So, what does this mean for your business?  It means you need to consider all the possibilities.

First, evaluate cloud-based options, and balance features with cost, time-to-value, and operational requirements.

Then, selectively innovate.  Figure out which areas of the business give you a competitive differentiation and innovate in those areas.

The traditional thinking, which is in line with the traditional ERP approach, is that all of the business functionality has to be incorporated into a single platform solution.  This is certainly no longer the case, and businesses are finding that they now have an ability to take advantage of the benefits of their existing systems while extending and innovating through the use of cloud services.