Philosophy of Process Improvement: Today’s CFO Focusing on Operations

Philosophy  of Process Improvement: Today’s CFO Focusing on Operations

There are a great many methodologies and approaches to “making businesses better” through process improvement.  From SixSigma to Continuous Process Improvement to Total Quality Management – all describe methods of measuring performance and outcomes to return intelligence oriented towards improvement.  Many of these approaches are generally applied in manufacturing businesses, because in manufacturing it’s easier to see where processes may be flawed because the process works with tangible elements.  Making corrections in a process can improve the performance of that process by reducing errors or increasing efficiency.  The truth of the matter is that every business is like a manufacturing business, and applying measurements to the various processes the business performs can reveal the secrets to improving not only process performance and product quality, but resultant profitability.

A recent article on CFO.com  titled Operations Take Center Stage, author David McCann discusses how some CFOs are improving business profitability and performance by delving deeper into operational areas of the business, and not remaining focused squarely on accounting and finance issues.

“Operations is the key to everything,” says Larry Litowitz, finance chief at SECNAP Network Security, a secure Internet-services provider. “That orientation is found most at manufacturers, but it should be at every company.”

Fiscal and financial matters are important to every business, but focusing on accounting for the end-result of business activities assumes that the work leading to the result is useful and effective.  As more attention is paid to conservation of cash, reduction of expenses, and overall profit improvement, CFOs are necessarily moving deeper into the operational aspects of the business to uncover potential not previously addressed.  In some cases, the move is more a function of self-defense and necessity than desire, as businesses increasingly compress spending on management, merging the functional roles of CIO, COO and CFO.

Increasingly, CFOs may find themselves taking on operational tasks whether they want to or not. At larger companies, the steady waning of the chief operating officer position has resulted in more operational responsibility for CFOs, recruiters say. In 2000, 47% of the 669 companies included in either the Fortune 500 or S&P 500 had COOs; in 2012, only 35% did, according to executive-recruiting firm Crist Kolder’s 2012 “Volatility Report of America’s Leading Companies.”

Some accounting professionals may believe that they don’t have the skills and experience to suggest changes in operational areas of their client businesses.  I would suggest that logic and reason are generally the prevailing factors supporting process improvement – reasoning that is often developed through simple observation.  Taking the time to understand what the business is doing at each level, and then actually observing those activities and accounting for their effectiveness and error rate, is how professionals can spend quality time in the business and uncover hidden profit potential.

Litowitz says CFOs can influence operations at a range of companies, including service-oriented businesses. “It’s really no different. The work is a set of activities,” he insists… “All these activities can be analyzed, controlled, and measured against a predetermined standard,” says Litowitz. And just as on a manufacturing floor, efficiency generates profit, justifying the CFO’s involvement.

Make Sense?

Joanie Mann Bunny FeetJ

CooperMann 2012 in review

CooperMann 2012 in review

2012 Was an interesting year, to say the least.  Not that it wasn’t a good year, but it certainly brought its share of challenges as well as opportunities.  At CooperMann.com, we attempted to reflect upon these challenges and opportunities, discussing how they impact our views on accounting and technology and business in general.

While the economy continued to struggle and churn, business owners found that reducing operating costs and creating sustainability in the business were initiatives they could no longer afford to minimally address. As advancements in technology and the growing popularity of cloud computing models resulted in a number of solutions to help businesses meet those cost and continuity issues, they also introduced new and different challenges for accounting and finance professionals seeking to reinforce their relevance and value to the business.  They say that the only constant is change, so we should expect no fewer challenges (or opportunities!) in the new year.

Joanie Mann Bunny Feet

As for CooperMann.com, here’s how we did in 2012, our inaugural year

600 people reached the top of Mt. Everest in 2012. This blog got about 10,000 views in the latter part of 2012. If every person who reached the top of Mt. Everest viewed this blog, it would have taken 17 years to get that many views.

The busiest day of the year was October 2nd: The most popular post that day was

Attractions in 2012

These are the posts that got the most views on CooperMann in 2012.

Changing How We See Software: QuickBooks 2013 interface frustrates power users

Is This The End Of ERP?

In Bookkeeping, Accounting, and Information Technology: The Value of Outsourcing

Working With the Right Numbers: Financial Data Analysis Requires Accurate Financial Data

Not Everybody’s Accounting Online: Outsourced Bookkeeping and Accounting for “Offline” Clients

Top 3 Favorite posts for 2012

One-Write System Revolutionizes Accounting: These guys had the right idea, they just didn’t have the cloud.

The race to find the “secret sauce” of hosted application services for small business

Accounting Professionals: It’s Good To Be Sticky

Where in the world is CooperMann viewed?

CMC2012-countries

buildingup-small-logoWhat’s coming up for 2013?  Keep watching CooperMann.com and BuildingUP.biz to stay on top of current issues and trends in accounting and business technology.