Category: cpa

Posted on

Accounting Online and Outsourced Accounting – Focus on Enabling Your Client

Accounting professionals and those involved in business bookkeeping and accounting service delivery have been literally bombarded with messages about “taking your practice to the cloud” and “working closer with clients using the cloud”, but what does all this really mean for the average professional practitioner?  Does it mean that the software and processes already established in the practice need to be replaced?  Does it mean that accounting professionals need to get all of their clients into online applications?  Are the tools used by the professional practice obsolete?  These are all valid questions, and are issues not always addressed in the marketing messages of the various “solution” providers.  The complexity exists with the variety of tools and solutions most professionals use in servicing their business clients, and no single-solution cloud service is able to adequately address this variety.  As a result, many professionals are either trying to assemble their own toolkits through an expensive and frustrating process of trial-and-error, or are avoiding adoption of new technologies altogether.

There are a lot of ways to “enable” a professional practice, focusing on the technologies and applications supporting efficient and profitable service delivery.  The key in selecting the right tools to support the practice is to fairly evaluate the nature of services to be delivered, and understanding how and where in those processes the firm and the client “touch”.  It is in the interaction – of people, data and systems – where better technology-supported collaboration with the client should be established.  In many cases, this means focusing on improving the client system and the accounting process will benefit as a result.

Processes which are entirely internal to the practice must certainly be evaluated and improved, but the initial problem – the new area of focus – is in how the firm and the client work together.  The needs in this area will necessarily drive adjustments to internal processes, which is to be expected.  Most practitioners have already established their methods of dealing with clients, workloads, paper and software that have been around for a while.  It is the new client demand – to get more benefit from existing providers and solutions – which must be addressed.

For example, there was once a need to obtain bank statements and cancelled checks in order to balance a bank account.  This caused many accounting firms to develop a standard process of sending someone to the bank each month to pick up the paper statements and documents for client accounts, so that the bookkeeping could be done and accounts reconciled. With the advent and acceptance of online banking tools, the process for most accountants has been adjusted to where the bank activity data is simply downloaded and integrated into the company accounting information, rather than transported in the form of paper documents which are then keyed in as data.  This simple example of “enabling” the client accounting system to interact with the bank resulted in benefits to the accountant processes, and caused beneficial changes to be made in the internal process of the firm (no more driving to the bank, timely access to bank data, more accurate data due to single-entry of information).  While the client likely doesn’t care how the books get done, they do care about the information being timely, complete and accurate.  Thusly is the accountant value increased through the simple use of a readily available technology.

As accounting and finance professionals look to find ways to deliver greater value to their business clients, they would be wise to explore how and why they interact with those clients and understand what is missing – what more can be done – to support and advise those client business owners.  By focusing on helping the client “tool up” their enterprises to support more efficient and profitable operation, professionals will find that the resultant benefit is more consistent and streamlined access to client data.  Enabling the client, in many ways, is enabling the firm.

Make Sense?

J

Read more about Online Accountants and Their Clients: Working Smarter, or just Closer?

Read more about Data Warriors: Accountants in the Cloud

Read more about using the cloud to extend “connectedness” beyond traditional boundaries

Posted on

Online Accountants and Their Clients: Working Smarter, or just Closer?

Online Accountants and Their Clients: Working Smarter, or just Closer?

There are a wide variety of ways to work closer with your clients, and the thing that you will always want to remember is that “one size does not fit all”.  In other words, not every client will like using your favorite technology or software, and not every business owner will recognize your suggestions as solutions, because perhaps they did not recognize the problem in the first place.  But that’s OK, and perhaps how it should be.  You see, using the right tool for any given situation is the proper approach, rather than trying to shoehorn everyone into the same solution or method.  With a client-centric approach, you can still develop consistent internal processes to keep your service delivery as efficient as possible, because many of the core services you provide are consistent across the client base regardless of the solution in use.  The trend is to help your client work smarter, and it will bring you closer to the client than ever before.

Determining what is right for each job or task should be part of your value, whether it’s deciding how to connect remotely with your client, or helping your client find the right software system to support their tasks, with you ensuring that the integration to the accounting system is there and working properly.  Where the focus was once placed on accurate data entry, now it’s on placing the proper solution in front of the user, and through the use of the solution to perform their various tasks, the necessary data is collected. Accounting professionals should recognize that the collection of information in real time facilitates better business decision making, and that they can be instrumental in delivering this decision support resource to their client.

As an example, I know the owner of a small construction business.  This guy runs around with estimates, invoices, receipts, and other paperwork in his truck, and getting him to stop long enough for his bookkeeper to collect all that paper from the truck cab is one of the hardest and most annoying jobs she has.  Her focus is on collecting the paper and then entering the data and getting invoices and reports out.  The accountant is frequently requesting more information or clarification of data, as well as the information necessary to meet various reporting deadlines.  Even after implementing QuickBooks accounting in the office for this business, the ultimate problem wasn’t solved.  Certainly, the information is better-organized and accounted for once collected and entered, but the business owner still lacks timely information about the performance of his business, and sees little additional value in his accountants participation beyond the annual tax return.

On the other hand, I know another guy (landscaping this time) who has an accountant that has him use his phone to record just about everything he does as he does it.  He bids a job, and sends it via email.  He gets paid for a job, then snapshots a copy of the check and deposits it.  Buying equipment or supplies?  Sure, but electronic payment and approval tools let him track that as it happens, too (again, snapshot a copy of that receipt, etc.).  For this business owner, there is more business going on because less time is being spent doing the paperwork of business.  The bookkeeper in the office has the information necessary to keep things up to date, and can focus on how to streamline things even better.  The accountant has a much higher quality of information – faster – upon which to advise the client (which he has time to do, because he’s not cleaning up bookkeeping data or collecting information for reports and returns).  This business owner sees much more value in the participation by his accountant, because real issues are able to be identified and addressed in time to make a difference.

So, for today’s accounting professional, bookkeeper or consultant: is the idea of “working closer” with your client simply the concept of working remotely on the same systems at any given time, or is it to know more about their business and to help them do business better?

Make Sense?

J

Read more about Data Warriors: Accountants in the Cloud

Read more about using the cloud to extend “connectedness” beyond traditional boundaries

Posted on

Is your purchasing and expense approvals process holding up your business?

Is your purchasing and expense approvals process holding up your business?

When a small business owner hears about purchase and expense tracking, they immediately think of traveling sales people needing reimbursement for plane tickets, hotel rooms, and meals.  For others, it is a process geared towards control, making sure monies aren’t being spent where they are not approved.  Either way, purchasing and expense approval processes are generally viewed as “necessary evils” of doing business, and as such are often facilitated with spreadsheets to which receipts, invoices, quotes, or other documentation is attached.  Reviewing and approving this information is generally a manual process which takes time and attention from other activities.

When times are good, when credit easy to come by and everyone is fat, no one sweats the small stuff. But times haven’t been good for a while and today the small stuff looms large, especially in small businesses trying to grow at a time when investors and customers are wary.
CFO.com (http://s.tt/1kq4O)

Yet, as with so many things in business and in life… it’s not a problem until it becomes an obvious problem.  Most businesses don’t really recognize the amount of time they invest in these types of reporting activities, much less realizing that there are bigger business benefits to be achieved if only they would leverage technology to intelligently address the process.  Redundant information entry and exchange is reduced, accuracy of expense reporting is improved, and data collection and integration eliminates the impact of re-entering  information, or time delays in manual paper-based processes.

The growing problem at Blade, Verbeck says, was not so much that money was being misspent as that the work was burning up his and the finance department’s time. Requests and invoices piled up on his desk, distracting him from more valuable tasks, while employees were either waiting to purchase the stuff they needed to do their jobs or buying and expensing it.
CFO.com (http://s.tt/1kq4O)

In a recent article on CFO.com, David Rosenbaum describes several business experiences in addressing the payables approval process, and the benefits achieved through solving what was once not recognized as a problem.  From simply reducing the amount of money spent on nonessential items, to finding cancelled contracts still being paid, a structured and intelligent approvals process can make big differences in a variety of areas.  The essential element is a structured and intelligent process and not one designed simply to factor the spend into the cash flow.

The savings that can be retrieved by automating and rationalizing approval and purchasing processes are palpable (a 2009 Aberdeen Group study estimated that “improving the percentage of all non-payroll, tax, tariff, and fee-related spend” — that is, indirect, nonstrategic expenses — brought under the management of a dedicated group can help enterprises “achieve a 5% to 20% cost savings for each dollar brought under spend management”). But the real value, says Kristen Lampert, corporate-services manager at specialty-investment bank Ziegler, is de-risking organizational spending by making sure the approval chain has the right people weighing in on the right things.

There’s an old saying that “if all you have is a hammer, then every problem looks like a nail”, and Microsoft Excel has been the hammer of choice for many businesses over the years.  However, there are some things that can (and perhaps should) be done better and more efficiently with a solution designed specifically for that purpose.  Not everything is better in a spreadsheet.

Make Sense?

J

Read the entire article on CFO.com

  • Read more about using the cloud to extend “connectedness” beyond traditional boundaries 
  • Read more about how there’s no fear and loathing in accounting
  • Read more about the pressure on accountants to deliver more value and intelligence to their clients
  • Read more about Data Warriors: accounting in the cloud
Posted on

Success in the Finance Department: Better Data and Analysis

Success in the Finance Department: Better Data and Analysis

CFOs and corporate controllers are beginning to recognize the increased value they can deliver to the organization when they take a more holistic and comprehensive approach to data reporting and analysis.  The key is in delegation of duties, and establishing the controls and connections which ensure proper (and complete) flow of information throughout the enterprise.  The finance department can easily become overburdened if not structured properly, but can be as easily undervalued if the sole focus is getting the numbers right.

An article on CFO.com discusses some of the elements of structuring the finance department for greater success, and identifies the value of taking a proactive, consultative and analytical approach to business finance.

“For a CFO, “success is not just about getting the numbers right, but also uncovering the story behind the numbers: taking raw accounting information and creating cogent and compelling management discussion and analysis,” says Eileen Kamerick, managing director and CFO at investment bank Houlihan Lokey.

Those who take the big picture into account are more likely to develop an organizational structure that isn’t merely reactive. That will allow staff to come up with more ideas and, ultimately, help drive revenue and run the business. “You have to create an organization so you aren’t in the engine all the time,” Kamerick notes.”


This is a great article… read the entire post on CFO.com here

You’ll find that it makes sense.

J

Posted on

Accountants and their Clients Online: Who Owns the Data?

Accountants and Clients Working Online: who owns the data?

Mobile device support and remote access to applications and data is becoming a standard requirement for most businesses today.  The “online” working model goes a long way towards addressing problems face when they need to get team members together no matter where they are.  When the information is stored and managed centrally, it is easier to provide access to outside accountants or other professionals.  Yet, while this collaborative working model solves numerous problems, it also introduces a number of issues that neither the business owner nor their outsourced professionals may have thought about.  One of these issues is the challenge represented with dissolution of the engagement, and subsequent division of information assets related to it.  This separation can become unfriendly and problematic if the parties do not have an agreed-to plan.  Quite frequently, disagreements result from the use of subscription-based online services which are not clearly delineated as customer-controlled versus provider-controlled.  In these cases, clients may benefit from the use of a service through their provider, not understanding that the provider ultimately owns or controls access to the solution and maybe even the data associated with the account.

In general, it is safe to take the approach that whoever pays the bill for the service is the owner of the data associated with it.  This “he who pays the bill owns the data” approach is simple and it makes the most sense.  Consider that the individual paying the bill for the services is the individual who is financially obligated for what occurs with the service, so it makes sense that they would have authority over service access and usage.

It is quite common in outsourced and online accounting models for a professional firm to subscribe to services or solutions which help them support various processing needs for their clients.  Solutions such as Bill.com or Paychex provide tools to assist professionals in efficient delivery of various process-support services, such as bill payments and approvals, or payroll processing and reporting.  These tools are utilized as part of the professional service offering, and are generally not directly exposed to the client users (other than in specific contexts, perhaps).  Separating the client from these systems is usually not difficult; the professional simply stops using the solution for that ex-client.   Since the transaction information from the solution ultimately integrates into the accounting data file, the accounting firm can simply return the accounting data file to the client without losing their process support data in the online service.  On the other hand, if the client was the subscriber to the solution and the accounting professional was “invited” to participate with them, the separation would mean that the accountant no longer had access to the online data, and the client would retain use of the solution.

In contrast to a process-supporting solution, separations become far more complicated when the online solution includes fundamental tools for the client like general business application access and data storage.  Consider that a business decides to use SmartVault for its document management needs, and also wants to connect documents and files directly to transactions in their QuickBooks accounting system.  In this situation, the accounting data and the document vault are closely connected, and contain a wide variety of valuable business documents and files.  When the solutions are both run as online services, where the QuickBooks applications are hosted along with the integration for SmartVault, both the accounting professional and their business client can work more closely and in real time, creating much more value in the relationship.  If the relationship does not work out, however, separating applications and data can be a frustrating process for both parties if there isn’t a clear understanding of who gets what.  It would be easier perhaps if the question centered on an accounting data file, but in these situations the problem extends to questions of ownership of source documents, working papers, and even application software licenses.

Accounting professionals need to protect the value of the work they perform on behalf of the client, and the business owner needs to have their business information and applications.  Clearly understanding how to orient subscription based services to protect the interests of both parties is an important element in providing the highest level of professional service to clients.  In some cases it makes sense for the professional to own and control the subscription, particularly if the service is an element which supports professional services delivery.  These tools help you provide services to your clients, and the client benefits from the result of use of the solution.  If the client leaves you, then it is up to them to “tool up” their own operations to handle those processes.

In other cases, it makes far more sense for the client business to own and control their online services, and invite their outside professionals to participate. The benefits of working together are still present, and the remote access and mobility aspects benefit the business owners and team members as much as their remote professionals.  The accounting professionals can preserve their working papers and other work product on their own systems, drawing a clear line between their retained data versus that of the client and making a potential future separation much easier to facilitate.

jmbunnyfeet

Make sense?

J

Posted on

Working With the Right Numbers: Financial Data Analysis Requires Accurate Financial Data

There is a lot of discussion these days about big data and financial data analysis.  One of the most valuable aspects of the available tools for performing financial analysis, forecasting and “what-if” scenarios is the ability for a business to benchmark their performance against other businesses in similar industries.  By comparing their performance metrics with other like businesses, an owner or manager may be able to identify items in the performance profile which could be improved or which may represent differentiation from competitors.

When speaking to accounting professionals about the additional valuable services they could be providing to clients by using these KPI reporting tools to identify additional consultation and advisory services clients need, the feedback I generally get from the professional is that “you have to get the numbers right, first”.  It seems that, even with the ready availability of powerful and affordable software solutions to run the business, accounting and finance still tends to be an afterthought for many business owners.  Relegated to the back-office, and being an after-the-fact recipient of transactional data, accounting is still viewed by many as a “necessary evil” of doing business rather than an area of potential strategic advantage.

Many accounting professionals are still struggling with finding the right approach to help clients get better financial reporting on a regular basis, in as near real time as possible, without having to practically live in the client systems.  These professionals are often still approaching the problem by attempting to get the client to participate in the financial systems directly by inputting checks and payments, creating invoices, and doing other types of work the client needs to perform – and using the accounting system to do it.

This approach may well be the source of the dilemma, and all because the client is being asked to work in the accountant’s software rather than with a solution which addresses specifically the tasks the business users need to perform on a regular basis.  When users have tools which don’t suit their requirements well, they tend to not use the tools properly, if at all.  When users are provided with tools suited specifically to solving their functional or process support problems (Service Oriented Architecture approach, or SOA – what Doug Sleeter calls “chunkify”), usage and accuracy can increase dramatically.  Getting the numbers right means getting the supporting solution right first. When these solutions are properly configured and deployed, data collection and integration can become a “stealth” process, silently passing information from one system to another, significantly improving the accuracy and quality of data.

Accounting professionals who focus on assisting their clients with applying the right solutions to support operational as well as accounting processes, and who help to create the controls around the appropriate flow of information end-to-end, are delivering very high levels of value to those client businesses.  It is the assistance these consultative professionals provide, helping the business facilitate its processes faster and more efficiently, which increases the accuracy and, ultimately, the meaning of the resulting financial data.

Make Sense?

J

Interested in learning more about tools which can help your professional practice get more opportunity from every client?  Contact me @JoanieMann on Twitter, or connect with me on LinkedIn or Facebook.

  • Read more about how accountants need business intelligence, too
  • Read more about how there’s no fear and loathing in accounting
  • Read more about the pressure on accountants to deliver more value and intelligence to their clients
  • Read more about Data Warriors: accounting in the cloud