Is great customer service the entire customer experience?

Is great customer service the entire customer experience?

I’ve been working with accounting technologies for a long time, and much of that time and activity has been focused on online accounting models and solutions.  The Authorized Hosting Program for QuickBooks is a good example of the type of service model that’s garnered a lot of attention over the past couple of years, particularly since desktop QuickBooks editions continue to be the accounting solutions of choice for new and growing small businesses, even as those businesses look to leverage the cloud for remote and mobile access to business information.  But hosted QuickBooks delivery models vary tremendously from provider to provider, so how does an accounting professional or their client business owner know which service will suite them best?

At the surface, most of the QuickBooks hosting services available today look pretty much alike.  In concept, they are, but in reality the technology each provider elects to deploy makes a big difference in the experience of the hosted service user.  Some deployment models require a lot of 3rd party software to make the service work, and some providers have constructed their own “black box” technology to make the delivery possible.  The result is a wide variety of service models and delivery approaches, some of which may perform better or offer more functionality than others.  But these details are often difficult to discern when evaluating the various provider deliveries, so most folks simply resort to pricing comparisons.  Unfortunately, this isn’t really the best way to measure the quality of the provider or the service.  There’s still some truth to the old adage that “you get what you pay for”, even when a service has become commoditized in the market.  On the other hand, just because a service is more expensive doesn’t mean it is better.

It is often difficult to get prospective customers to see or understand the technical  nuances of any given hosted delivery, so many service providers are trying to find other ways to set themselves apart from the competition.  One approach that’s become quite popular is to tout the availability and quality of the customer service offered by the provider.  While I do believe that quality customer service should be available for subscribers at all times, I also recognize a bit of a problem with this marketing approach.

To illustrate the problem, I’ll describe a conversation I had with a hosted client last year.

This particular client was with an engineering firm, and the company was subscribing to hosting services for a variety of Microsoft applications, including MS Project (not that it matters, really).  Anyway, this client called me up one day just to chat about something that was frustrating him, and that was an issue of irregular system performance.  Sometimes it was really speedy, and sometimes things would slow down to a crawl and nobody seemed to know why.  He said that he and his team members had been regularly in contact with the support department, and that the support team was always cheerful, helpful, and willing to work with them to find out what the issue might be.  Unfortunately, they didn’t find anything, and suggested that the client continue to contact them when there was a problem.  This went on for quite a number of months, and the client continued to be frustrated with the service performance but quite pleased with the support response.  Then he told me a story.

He said that he used to have a Mercedes, and he loved that car.  It was beautiful and fun to drive, and yes, pretty expensive.  The car had frequent issues, and for this reason he got to know the guys at the Mercedes dealership really well.  He knew all of their names, and they knew his.  He even sent them Christmas cards every year.  He couldn’t have wished for a nicer group of people to service his vehicle.

Then he bought a Toyota.  He really liked this new car, too.  It was fun to drive, sporty, and a little more affordable than the Mercedes was.  This car didn’t need nearly as much maintenance as the previous one, and he had far fewer problems with it.  He never got to know the names of the guys in the service department at the Toyota dealership, because he didn’t go there very often.  When he did, the service was fast and courteous – pretty much what he expected.  But the best part was that he didn’t become closely acquainted with the dealership service team, because the car just worked.

You know those car commercials on TV, where the sales person is telling the customer about how great the warranty on the vehicle is?  Yeah – the one where the customer wants to know if they should buy a good car, or buy a car with a good warranty.  Makes you think, doesn’t it?

When you’re looking for a hosting service provider to deliver QuickBooks and other desktop software to you via the cloud, remember that great customer service is only part of the puzzle.   The best solution is the one that just works, and doesn’t leave you needing a lot of support.

Are you on a first name basis with your hosting support team?  You might want to think about why that is.

Make sense?

J

Read more about using the cloud to extend your access and collaboration beyond traditional boundaries.

Building Smarter Businesses: Staying Relevant in a Cloud Accounting World

Building Smarter Businesses: Staying Relevant in a Cloud Accounting World

They are pretty interesting commercials, and they get you thinking.  You know what I mean: those IBM commercials about developing models for the prediction of traffic conditions in Singapore, and “infusing intelligence into the systems and processes that make the world work”.   What they’re saying makes sense, but most business owners would likely say that it addresses bigger issues and doesn’t really speak to them.

The Wikipedia entry on Smarter Planet is introduced as “a corporate initiative [which] seeks to highlight how forward-thinking leaders in business, government and civil society around the world are capturing the potential of smarter systems to achieve economic growth, near-term efficiency, sustainable development and societal progress”.   You see, the ability to leverage technology to collect data and analyze that data in real time can make a huge difference, whether it is in a small business or a global system. With an intelligent approach to enabling the enterprise, we can build smarter businesses and introduce new relevance for accounting and finance professional involved with them.

“Together, we have to consciously infuse intelligence into our decision-making and management systems, not just infuse our processes with more speed and capacity . . . We are moving into the age of the globally integrated and intelligent economy, society and planet. The question is, what will we do with that?” IBM chief executive Sam Palmisano

Our software and systems have reached the point where data collection and raw business intelligence is being gathered in real time by businesses small and large.  This new world of information management is no longer focusing on paper-based systems or business process automation; this is the world of real time information, big data and analysis.

For accounting and finance professionals, this is your time.  Accounting is not simply the final dumping ground for after-the-fact financial data; it is the department responsible for turning collected data into actionable information.  Data is just data, but information is power.

Information management and computing paradigms are shifting, and for accounting and finance professionals, the solution to the relevance problem is quite simple: shift your thinking of what accounting and finance is, and use it to your advantage.

The competitive landscape for businesses of all kinds is changing along with the progress and adoption of technology.  Accounting professionals in particular should be paying close attention to what’s happening out there, and learning to use the tools which will help them find the patterns and trends in the system which can help to forecast more accurately – coming closer to having that crystal ball than ever before.

Whether the attention is on small business or large enterprise, accounting professionals and information management specialists need to work together, and use the cloud and connected technologies to help achieve the benefits of growth, efficiency, sustainable development and progress envisioned by the Smarter Planet initiative.

Make Sense?

J

The race to find the “secret sauce” for hosted application services for small business

The race to find the “secret sauce” for hosted application services for small business

Cloud computing is here to stay.  What was once viewed as bleeding-edge technology fraught with peril and risk is now recognized as an emerging standard for application deployment and delivery.  The race to the clouds represents a significant challenge, however, when issues of application interoperability and integration are introduced – particularly when it comes to small business solutions which traditionally reside on the local PC and network.

Today’s available technologies and platforms quite nicely facilitate single application deliveries, yet frequently fail to address the dynamic provisioning and deployment requirements of a rich integrated application environment.  Users who desire to select from a variety of applications in a hosted environment are most often met with barriers which won’t allow them to have the particular mixture of solutions they need.

While virtualization approaches for platforms and applications are gaining popularity and increasing in capability, the reality of the problem still rests with the fact that, in order for the applications to integrate, they must be installed on the same machine.  There is a race amongst the virtualization platform providers to find the “secret sauce” of application hosting; to enabling a flexible, dynamic, rich application delivery method which overcomes the need to have integrated applications installed together on servers in pre-selected ‘packages’.  With the secret sauce, the provider would be able to offer the customer any possible combination of available applications, and offer them as fully integrated solutions, regardless of whether or not those applications were actually installed on a machine together somewhere.

Currently, the solution is addressed (sort of) in how the provider deals with three main elements in the service model, which are packaging, provisioning, and business rules.  With these three ingredients appropriately approached in a flexible infrastructure and partner network, the potential for broad hosted application delivery and distribution exists.   Service providers are still stuck with the requirement to pre-select their various partner or integrated application inclusions, but it is possible to offer the perception of maximum flexibility without actually having it.  The challenge is not presented with the business rules, but in the packaging and provisioning processes.

Packaging is the step where the item to be provisioned is combined with other elements, resulting in a service or installation “package”.  Much like a manufacturing assembly process, packaging takes into consideration the total resource utilization or requirement, accounting for all resources combined into or used to create the package.  Packaging cannot be performed without first understanding, at a detailed level, what can be provisioned and how.  With the variety of applications, data services, implementation methodologies and models which exist, a single method approach has proven to not address a majority of software products currently available on the SMB market, and is unlikely to in the near future.

An example of this challenge is partially revealed when we look at the diversity of applications involved in the Microsoft Office ecosystem.  Many businesses rely upon the functionality present on the Office suite desktop products, such as Word, Excel and PowerPoint.  For some application users, this functionality is not present in their primary use software, but is presented via desktop level integration methods.  In order to deliver the full functionality and capability of the primary use application, the installation and integration support for the Office applications must also be provisioned and packaged into the service.   Offering even limited integrations and options like Office for inclusion in the package can introduce challenges in data access and management, permissions and file level security, and ISV licensing of applications.  For these and other reasons, attempting to provide a rich, user-selected mixture of deliverables poses the ultimate challenge to the application service provider.

When a cloud or application hosting provider can offer their customers the ability to sign up for, purchase, and utilize without complication or delay their selections of desktop or web-based applications, services and integrations, and pay for them as a subscription service accessible at any time and from anywhere – that’s the secret sauce of application hosting and cloud IT that everyone’s looking for.

Make sense?

J

The Holistic Approach to Cloud-Enabling Your Firm

The Holistic Approach to Cloud-Enabling Your Firm

Today’s professional accounting or law practice has a number of issues to contend with, not the least of which is technology.  While IT has been serving the firm for years, shifting paradigms in computing are leading professionals to wonder exactly which direction they should turn for advice.  It’s easy, at a high level, to see the value and benefit of outsourced IT services and being able to focus on your core offerings, but it’s a little harder to find exactly which path your firm should follow.  One thing has proven true over the past few years: taking a holistic approach to cloud-enabling your firm is far better than any uncoordinated exchange of applications and services.

There are four areas the firm should explore when looking to more fully leverage technology to its benefit, which is what “cloud-enabling” the practice really means:

  1. Transitioning to a paperless (or less paper) office
  2. Exploring alternative billing methods (value versus time?)
  3. Outsourcing non-core and non-strategic tasks and processes
  4. Streamlining procedures to create consistency in service levels

The challenge is that firms have numerous options and approaches being thrown about, none of which represent obvious solutions to the entire problem.  In pieces, cloud services and online applications can deliver new capability and functionality, but a professional practice has the requirement for systems to work together to be effective.  Re-entry or redundant storage of data is inefficient, so it is difficult to streamline procedures when the systems run on different platforms or don’t integrate well.

One approach is the “hybrid” approach, where you take the best of the tried and true, and deploy it in new ways to create new capabilities.  Also introducing cloud-based and SaaS solutions where they can truly help the firm innovate makes sense, as long as those solutions can connect back to the core systems. The key is to not lose what efficiency and business intelligence the firm already has while attempting to transform and improve upon those models (digital transformation).

The new thinking by some firms is to adopt web-based practice management solutions that make it easier to collaborate with team  members and clients.  Many of these solutions get great reviews and indeed do make it easier for users to access information from anywhere and on mobile devices.  Lots of neat features for the forward-thinking practice are available, yet the problem is that these solutions usually don’t have general accounting functionality required by the business, nor do they address some of the fundamental capabilities that apps on the desktop can.

For the online applications serving line-of-business functionality, the easy answer to finance department questions is to connect to an online accounting solution, like QuickBooks Online.  While this may serve the needs of the developer, the needs of the business finance department often outpace the functionality available in the smb online accounting products.  To address this reality, many developers have created the means to export data to the QuickBooks software running on the local desktop.

The desktop editions of QuickBooks remain extremely popular with professional service firms and the businesses they serve. In a cloud and mobile world, the firm and their client doesn’t have to be tied to the local desktop in order to keep their desktop software or collaboratively work in the data.  When the QuickBooks desktop software is setup within a secure remote access environment (whether on-premises or with a hosting provider), users benefit from the same mobility and realtime collaboration advantages as with a SaaS solution, like anytime/anywhere access.

Virtual desktops and remote application models allow users to access what seems like a workstation in the cloud, with business applications such as QuickBooks and Microsoft Office and whatever else the firm uses. The desktop is a true Windows platform, so the features and functionality are just as they are when working directly on a local PC.

Most remote or virtual desktop setups also let the user access the Internet and use a browser on the remote desktop, allowing users to run the SaaS solutions they’ve subscribed to alongside their desktop applications yet still remain in a totally virtual and mobile working environment. This approach allows the firm to centralize management and administration of internal servers and networking resources, or eliminate much of the maintenance and management by outsourcing to a hosting provider. Outsourcing the hosting and management of systems further establishes predictability in cost and increases IT agility.

The thing to remember is that one size does not fit all, and every firm will need to work within their own requirements and motivations to come up with the proper approach.  What works for a solo practitioner or small firm won’t necessarily work for a larger firm… or maybe it will, depending on the company culture and structure. There are a lot of options with the cloud when it comes to outsourced information technology models, online practice management and other business solutions, and mobile services which reduce the impacts of time and distance.  It’s time to start implementing on-demand access and mobile-friendly service options before the competition leaves you behind.  Interestingly enough… the competition that looks like a huge and successful firm could be just one person using some really smart IT.

 

Make sense?

J

Compliance in the Cloud – Their System; Your Responsibility

Can you outsource compliance to the cloud?

Outsourcing IT to a cloud service provider can be tremendously beneficial for a business.  The model allows an organization to offload not just IT infrastructure costs, but also the costs associated with developing and maintaining all of the practices and processes involved in managing and maintaining the infrastructure and systems.   There is tremendous responsibility in handling everything from platforms and infrastructure to creating best practices for maintenance, management of scalability and growth, forecasting bandwidth requirements, implementing and monitoring security compliance, creating effective and comprehensive disaster recovery plans, and more.

The question which begs to be asked is whether or not HIPAA, PCI/DSS or any other compliance requirements, and the complexities, risk and legalities that come along with them, can also be outsourced to the CSP. For that matter, can any real level of responsibility be fully outsourced, where the liability for non-performance or noncompliance is also fully shifted?

Ummm. No. It is still your problem.

What too many companies really don’t understand is that they aren’t eliminating risk by moving to the cloud, and the requirement to meet various compliance requirements really can’t be outsourced. Particularly in this area, businesses need to recognize that outsourcing certain functions doesn’t reduce or eliminate responsibility or liability.  Just the converse, it could make things a bit more difficult if you don’t keep close tabs on how the provider implements and is involved with your solution. Even beyond that, what is the impact to the business operation when requirements are not met?  Cost recovery from the provider may be one option, but how does that help the business remain operating in the meantime?

“Gramm-Leach-Bliley (GLB) Act  Requires financial organizations to enter into contracts with third parties that they share their customer information with (including cloud vendors) to ensure that the third-party handles that information securely. Executives of those financial organizations can be held personally liable for failure to do so.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)  Defines specific security mandates and requirements for financial reporting to protect shareholders and the public from accounting errors and fraudulent practices. SOX dictates which records are to be stored and for how long and requires the data owner to know the location of the data in the cloud and to maintain control of it. Failure to comply can result in fines and/or imprisonment.”

source: CIO.com

This discussion Isn’t limited just to compliance with regulations (at least it shouldn’t be)

In this conversation we need to also address what a business should do in terms of protecting and preserving its information assets (data!) even beyond what the CSP offers. Keeping confidential and private information secure and protecting the data of the business (and clients or patients or other entities) is essential, even when the CSP fails in its obligations or abilities.  This aspect of disaster recovery and continuity planning is not often considered by the CSP yet remains critical to the business customer. The sales pitch, however, never really delves into this area, because it represents an aspect of service coverage that the provider simply can’t provide.

Illustrating this particularly difficult aspect of outsourcing to the cloud is the hard lesson learned by customers of a QuickBooks hosting provider who experienced a severe outage due to a ransomware attack. The hosting service provider promised customers it backed up their data and it did, but the backup archives were also compromised.  In order to restore service, customers were expected to have their own backups of the cloud-hosted data.

While there may have been items in the service agreement which address these issues, I can say – based on a great deal of experience in just this area – the service providers rarely make this point very clear to customers, and more frequently tell customers backing up their data is no longer something they need to really worry about. It’s like that really tiny type at the bottom of a contract that nobody notices until it is too late.

“..restoration proved more difficult in Texas. Lezama explained that for the Texas clients, the backups had been compromised as well, because their backup data had synchronized with corrupt files. But Cloudnine clients are obligated backup their own data as well, as a sort of third-level security measure..”

source: AccountingToday

With compliance in the cloud, it’s their system, but your responsibility.

Outsourcing IT to a cloud service provider in no way eliminates or reduces the obligations of the business to manage certain aspects of information systems and data.  What outsourcing can do is deliver a greater operational capacity and agility more affordably.

The responsibilities to establish information and systems management practices and processes remain firmly with the business, and actually represent a strategic component of the business that is unwise to outsource anyway. Resilience in a business and its ability to conform to regulatory and other requirements are the foundations of sustainability. Remember that cloud providers and services can be leveraged to improve certain cost and system performance metrics, but it remains solely with the business customer to find ways to reduce risk and create a greater assurance of continued operational capability.

Make Sense?

J