Mac – Cooper Mann Consulting

Microsoft’s upcoming November 2020 update has some direct impacts to users running macOS, especially if running macOS 10.31 or earlier. As of November 10, 2020, existing Microsoft 365 for Mac users running macOS 10.13 or earlier will not receive any further Office application updates. If the machine is upgraded to macOS10.14 or later, updates will be allowed to proceed on that computer.

With the Microsoft 365 for Mac November 2020 update, users running macOS must be running 10.14 Mojave or later in order to continue to receive updates for Office applications, and any new installs of Microsoft 365 for Mac will require macOS 10.14 or later.

Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook and OneNote are the applications included which will no longer receive updates – including security updates – if the macOS they’re running on is too outdated.

Among the benefits of using Microsoft 365 is that the software is always kept up to date, including enhancements and new features as well as security and safety updates that help keep the software (and the associated data) more secure. You may continue with the older version of macOS, and your Office applications will continue to work. But losing out on updates not only keeps you from benefitting from the most current capabilities of the software (and getting full value from your subscription), but it also puts your security and compliance at risk.

Microsoft 365 applications are continuously updated with new features, connected services and enhancements to security. Modern operating system platforms are necessary to support some of these improvements, requiring users to update their computer operating systems as well as the applications running on them. With the Microsoft 365 November update, Mac users need to be running one of the three most recent versions of macOS to keep their Office applications recent, too.

Make Sense?

Giving Credit Where Credit Is Due

or – That was then, but this is now…

It constantly amazes me, seeing the number of conversations, forums, talkbacks, emails, etc. flurrying about the Internet that are focused on finding the way to “win” against Microsoft and Intuit – both companies, in certain circles, being referred to as “big brother”. Well, the 800lb gorillas, anyway.

There are the Linux community members, very appropriately using TCO (total cost of ownership) and security messages to get the attention of the market… you’ve got the Mac devotees who believe that computers can and should have good fashion sense… and then there are the Windows users who use it, but complain nonetheless.

With Intuit, you have a clear market-share leader in SMB accounting. As for the other market segments – it’s anybody’s guess who wins there. It’s arguable.

But what do these two companies have in common? In a word – success.

Let’s face it. Without them, there wouldn’t be a world of computer users representing a potential customer base for new products. Walk with me – let’s talk.

Computers were once quite expensive, unintuitive, and basically unavailable for most businesses. Then PCs emerged, Microsoft hit the market – and Windows opened across the world. (Yes, I realize the timeline here is seriously compressed, and DOS lived for a long time and we liked it). First, businesses broadly became computer users. Then consumers became computer users. Then everyone became a computer user. Granted, the guy at home playing “Flight Simulator” was a driving force in getting the mouse and better graphics into mainstream computing. But let’s remember that accounting and finance was among the first primary applications of general computing technology (the BETTER adding machine).

Changes in the accounting industry were also occurring at this point. Professional accounting practices began to move away from business bookkeeping, being a low-margin and labor intensive task. Intuit hit the market with QuickBooks, marketing based on the concept that “if you can write a check, you can do your own books”. While this was in direct opposition to the professional accountants’ belief that businesses need professional assistance with their accounting, it solved the dilemma of doing the books directly. So, many accounting practices at this point actually became focused on selling and supporting accounting software – looking at the technology as both a means to avoid direct bookkeeping as well as introducing additional revenue-earning services for the practice.

Both Microsoft and Intuit recognized a need in the market, and filled those needs quite nicely. They earned their market share largely based on useability and the concept of empowerment. This is what it took to build the size of market we see today. And let’s face it. They did it very well.

Today’s computer user is more savvy – more aware of the options and choices. But choice often seems like complexity. With Microsoft and Intuit being viewed by many as the defacto standards for small businesses, the choice seemed like it was already made and therefore the complexity of making the right purchasing decision was removed. This is not as true today as it once was.

There are other options available. Will they gain the same levels of adoption that their predecessors did? Doubt it. The concept of “one size fits all” isn’t true any more. People want tools that are specific to their requirements. Businesses want their computing platform and applications to do more for them than simply maintain status quo.

But we must always remember how we got here. Kudos to the big guys who built the market for the rest of us. We should revere these companies, and acknowledge the great thing they did – they created potential customers for all of us. Lots of ’em.

via Accounting and Business Technologies | Joanie Mann: Giving Credit Where Credit Is Due.