Tag: finance professionals

Posted on

Cloud and Digital are Driving Change in Professional Practice

Accounting and Finance Professionals: Cloud and Digital are Driving Change in Professional Practice

Accountants and financial consultants working in public practice are experiencing a revolutionary change, evolving from documents and paper-based processes with after-the-fact reporting to real-time business management and providing services which support daily decision-making.  The underlying cause for this evolution in business accounting is the technology: cloud and collaborative computing models are enabling much closer and regular interaction between accounting professionals and the businesses they serve. Even more, technology is taking its proper place in automating once tedious activities, allowing professionals to focus on causes and results rather than on transactions.

What is the real impact this is having on the accounting profession?  It’s forcing a new focus and attention on change management within the practice, and is causing professionals to recognize the requirement for standardization of processes and development of controls which are the foundations for creating sustainability in a business.  The goal now is placing reliance on process rather than people, which establishes the basis for intelligent automation.  Standardization of processes does not require that the firm lose its personality.  Rather, the mission at hand is to imbue the organization with its unique flavor and approach and to use process automation to develop and support consistency in the functions performed.

While cloud computing models allow accounting and finance professionals to work closer with their business clients, it is important that the practice look at those client interactions and develop standards for processes supporting frequently performed functions.  These operations generally represent the activities within the firm which generate the highest levels of profitability due to the consistency in approach and repetition of tasks, and are the activities to apply intelligent automation to first.  Those activities or engagements which represent the “one-offs” are often the most costly for the firm to perform, and therefore may not be the most profitable of activities and are certainly the most challenging to support with any significant level of automation.  It is in this area where AI will find useful value in the practice, where a more informed answer than simple process automation is required.

The surprising finding when looking at many professional practices with more than one partner/professional involved is that these firms often fail to develop even the most basic of standard processes which apply throughout the firm.  Rather, each partner or professional has “their way” of handling things, which challenges the supporting personnel as they try to deal with multiple working methods. The result is a lack of consistency in the service delivery to the clientele and reduced productivity and profitability for the firm.

The thing that these firms are failing to recognize – the light bulb over their heads that just isn’t lighting up – is that cloud computing and collaborative working models aren’t designed just to enable and facilitate a closer working relationship with clients.  They’re also able to be applied inside the professional practice, enabling a more productive and efficient workflow which addresses the strengths and capabilities of the entire organization. And it doesn’t stop there.  Businesses are relying upon their accounting professionals to provide guidance and develop controls and standards to support the client transformation from paper-based to digital operations, and embracing the entire realm of data and interactions associating with the business. Digital transformation in a client business demands transformation in those firms who serve it.

As professionals learn to go deeper in client operations they would do well to look internally, too, exploring how increased attention to process automation and consideration for the firm’s own “digital transformation” might lead to great profitability through market differentiation and improved performance.

Make Sense?

J

Posted on

Technology and Tools for Accounting Professionals

Joanie Mann Bunny FeetTechnology and Tools for Accounting Professionals

old_school_ledgerThere was a time not so long ago when accounting professionals focused more on tabulation and summarizing of information than on analysis.  Accounting for businesses, in particular, required collecting myriad papers and receipts and other transaction documents, summarizing the information, translating it into journal entries, and finally posting those numbers to the big bound book which represented the business general ledger.  With the work required to gather and enter all of the information, professionals necessarily focused their efforts on making the process as efficient as possible by attempting to structure the workflow and manage the paper.

When those efforts are compared to today’s approach which involves digital documents, intelligent data collection tools, automated workflow solutions, online accounting and data analysis, it is clear that the processes for accounting for business activities have not really become simpler.  In fact, much of the enabling technology has served to complicate certain processes, which drives users to find even more “solutions” to address these new problems.  It (IT) is a bit like the Wonka Everlasting Gobstopper, which never gets finished and never gets smaller.  IT simply changes things – regularly and often.

Back then – before the Internet and digital imaging, or even Personal Computers – high technology wasn’t the focus because it didn’t exist in the realm of business in general.  I suppose you could call business solutions at that time “low” technology, where mainly mechanical solutions were introduced to address various business problems.

old_school_filecabinet

As an example, prior to the advent of digital imaging and electronic documents, one of the primary requirements of the business was to organize and store paper documents.  Over time, a wide variety of filing, foldering and labeling solutions have been developed, all oriented towards making the storage and later retrieval of paper documents easier.  For some businesses, letting go of the paper is a hard thing to do.  Years and years of training in keeping paper files has left many business owners and managers wary of working without physical paper documents.  Investments in office space, filing cabinets, storage folders and personnel to organize, file and retrieve all of the documents is only a partial measurement of the cost of managing paper, and large numbers of businesses continue to operate in this manner.

old_school_desk

The technology applied to processing the work has also changed, in many ways even more dramatically than the technology applied to collecting and storing the information.  Take the simple processes of tabulation (to arrange in tabular form; condense and list) and summing (adding up) information, for example.  Previous generations didn’t have computers and spreadsheet software to perform the work.  Rather, individuals would painstakingly handwrite each transaction entry into a ledger or on a columnar worksheet, and would then have to manually add each column and then cross check footer totals to ensure accuracy.  Back then, the machines used to perform the addition/subtraction were mechanical devices and could not perform multiplication or division.   These adding machines were first hand-cranked devices, later replaced with shiny new electrical ones (weighing approximately 20 lbs each).

old_school_telephone

Even voice communications have changed dramatically over the years.  Many people don’t remember a time when having multiple phone lines in the business meant having multiple telephones, and the concept of a PBX (Private Branch eXchange) didn’t exist.  Every phone would be hard-wired to an incoming line; if you wanted to answer a call, you had to use the right phone.  This became difficult in an office with many people, so solutions such as the “fabulous extendo-phone” was invented to allow anyone in the office to access the phone from their desk.

The technology available to businesses today is astounding, and offers amazing potential and benefit.  On the other hand, technology rarely (truly) makes things simple or easy – it more frequently serves to shelter certain users from the complexity while delivering new workloads and concerns to others.  It’s rather like energy – it isn’t created or destroyed, it just changes form [law of conservation of energy].  Business is like that, particularly where information technology is involved.  The underlying requirement doesn’t go away, just like a business’s requirement to account for financial transactions and activities,  and the need for the business to capture and retain documents isn’t changed.  How the process is managed, and which tools or mechanisms are applied to the task is what changes.

Make Sense?

J

onewrite-accountant_apparatusOne-Write System Revolutionizes Accounting.  These guys had the right idea, they just didn’t have the cloud.

Posted on

Preparing for Disasters of the Legal Kind

Preparing for Disasters of the Legal Kind

As businesses begin to realize the benefits of cloud computing and business data mobility, they may be overlooking one of the most important issues any enterprise can face: information management in the event of litigation.  While the IT department probably has a disaster recovery plan for handling various computer system failures, is there also a plan for managing system data and electronic information in the event of a “legal disaster”?  In the spotlight is e-discovery, which is the requirement of the business to respond to legal requests for electronically stored information, and the issues CIOs and business owners should be paying attention to as computing solutions and technology models continue to change at a rapid pace.

The popularity of BYOD (Bring Your Own Device), data sync solutions, and online collaboration tools has created an environment where business data may exist in various states (meaning as in conditions or status, not as in State, like California) and on a variety of devices and systems, some of which may not be in the direct control of internal IT.  Regardless of where or how the information was delivered to these devices and systems, CIOs and business owners should recognize that the information on those devices is included in discovery requests, and should be prepared with a plan for dealing with the response.

This “e-discovery plan” is the most important thing, and it means not only working through the various aspects of managing the information, but also providing consideration to keeping the plan updated.  As technology changes, and as user behavior changes along with it, businesses must adjust their IT management approaches in kind.  Consider that a user couldn’t store business data on their phone until the phone was able to handle that function.   Now that smartphones are the norm and tablet computers are gaining in popularity, business data is roaming on personal and business devices.  These advancements may introduce productivity and process gains which provide an advantage to businesses, but they also introduce potential risk and certain complexity when it comes to e-discovery.

Litigation is always expensive, but sanctions for slow response or other costs can be avoided if the plan helps the business respond in a timely manner.  For this reason, the plan should include an identification of all sources for information (every location where business information and data is stored), as well as the steps to be taken to preserve this data in the current state.  If the business has systems which regularly purge information (like accounting systems which purge prior period details, email systems which automatically purge old emails, or backup systems which delete old backup files as new ones are made), all of these activities must be halted.  If the company doesn’t have access to control the various devices and systems to prevent these activities (or doesn’t know that they are happening), significant risk is introduced.  In the case of a legal “hold”, all data and metadata and the audit controls and files must be preserved.

The final steps in the plan are the steps to be taken after the litigation is over.  This is often times a forgotten part of the plan, which is the final destruction of the information gathered for discovery.  Not that the original data must be destroyed (consider ALL dependencies), but the “database” of collected information related to the litigation probably should be.  With this data pooled in a single place, it becomes a potentially valuable target for a data breach.  At minimum, the collected information could too-easily be pulled into an entirely new legal case.

IT managers, CIOs and business owners must be realistic about the information their enterprises generate and store, including being realistic about the risk potential that duplicated and mobile data represents.  It is not that the enterprise should be afraid of allowing mobility and providing remote access solutions, but it is essential that the enterprise control the use of these solutions and how they use or interact with business data.   Without a strictly enforced policy of usage and control for all devices, services and solutions “touching” business data, any legal disaster planning falls short.

Joanie Mann Bunny FeetMake Sense?

J

Read More:

Posted on

e-Discovery in the Cloud: Benefits versus Risks

e-Discovery in the Cloud: Benefits versus Risks

After many years of working with business professionals in “enabling” their organizations to make better use of technology, I must say that it is a bit frustrating trying to get folks to understand that this new and wonderful cloud computing model (or Internet-based computing, SaaS, or whatever-you-want-to-call-it computing) is still just technology.  It uses computers and disk drives, it runs software, it takes electricity, and it was developed by human beings.  It can break.   It’s not magical and perfect and you can’t get the good stuff for free.  Swim at your own risk.  So, assess the risks, and measure the benefits against the risks and costs.  For many, the benefits outweigh the risks, as cloud computing approaches can deliver advanced capabilities at cost levels not previously available to most businesses.

No industry is immune to the security and access considerations surrounding a cloud computing model.  Particular those lawyers involved in e-discovery (all of them) have recognizing the potential benefits – and tradeoffs – of the model.  This reality was clearly revealed at the ILTA (International Legal Technology Association) 2010 event in Las Vegas.  While the discussions at the conference were oriented specifically towards the legal profession, the IT-related discussions are totally relevant to every business.  Accounting and finance professionals should pay close attention to this type of conversation, as it relates very directly to accounting’s approach to information technology and the application of IT in the business or professional practice.

In a recap of the event entitled ILTA 2010 in Las Vegas: Strategic Unity, Defensibility, and the Cloud, author Chris Dale discussed that professionals in both public and corporate service must work with the IT departments towards a common goal.  “IT is no longer just a service department providing an infrastructure, applications, training, and troubleshooting.”  While these elements still remain as critical aspects of IT, the role has grown to also incorporate considerations for collaboration (collaborative information management), mobility, and social media.

Recounting one session attended, called Defensible Ediscovery Processes, the author related the variety of definitions provided to the general term” defensible”, which were pretty amusing.  These definitions ranged from “protected against attack“, to “less lousy practices“ or “practices which suck the least” (my personal favorite), and finally, “what you can get away with without being found guilty of spoliation“.  From these definitions then came qualifiers, such as “reasonableness” and “faith”.

Why would defensible processes be important, and how does this relate to IT or cloud computing?  An example of the element of “faith” came up in this context: ” how can [lawyers] have faith that the technology is delivering the right answers?”  A panelist gave the sample of “an email retrieved from (or possibly not retrieved from [love those lawyers]) a system, with 26.5 pages missing.  How can you be sure that the systems which you are using will not do that to you?”  These are valid questions in any IT environment, and are no less important when considering a cloud-based technology model.   The trade-offs are related to perfection in functionality and performance of the solution versus cost, and should be measured in proportion to one another.

The tradeoffs may come in a variety of areas, with collaboration and connectivity being the primary drivers (collaboration) and barriers (connectivity) to the model.  Businesses are more than ready to adopt cloud computing strategies based on the belief in improved collaboration, access to information, and improved IT management,  but tend to overlook the offsets in the areas of bandwidth availability (and consistency), application functionality (or lack thereof), and level of support available from the provider.  In support of this argument,  Jerry Justice (IT Director for SS&G – Certified Public Accountants and Advisers) posted in a LinkedIn discussion on the topic that “by design the Internet is ‘reasonably’ connected, but not the same as a well-connected [local] network.  the upside is it gives you the ability to connect from great distances, the tradeoff is that you experience variable connectivity.”

“The underlying issues are that there is a paradigm shift to working on the Internet (from working in the office) and then another shift when you add in cloud-based environments (versus local apps).  It is possible to be very productive, but .. you have to adapt your approaches“.

The idea “that perfect must be qualified by cost and proportionality” was also discussed in an ILTA session on cloud computing which included panelists from Autonomy iManage, Mayer Brown, and Ernst & Young.  “Cloud computing remains a contentious area, with no obvious agreement even as to what the term means, let alone as to its implications” wrote Mr Dale in his recap of the event.  While the panelists held differing views, the representative from Mayer Brown held a position similar to Mr Dale, in that it is important to “dissect the objections one at a time, accepting that there is room for more than one view, and testing arguments against the alternatives.  Arguments based on pure cost are pretty compelling, and if one method of achieving an objective is very much cheaper than the others, then the burden shifts to those who argue for the more expensive route.”

Discussions went on to describe differences between public cloud providers and others, who segregate customer data in “private and identifiable silos”.  “The key word here is identifiable“, writes the author, “which connotes a geographical certainty as well as anything else.  I sometimes wonder if the imagery associated with cloud computing (invariably a jagged line disappearing into some cumulus) does not leave some people with the idea that their precious data is indeed floating in some inchoate container up in the air.”

“If you neglect to provide in your contract that your data remains in a specified jurisdiction, and if you fail to conduct proper due diligence checks on the provider, then you deserve all you get.  Like any risk assessment, it involves weighing cost against other factors; most of these other factors are definable and quantifiable“.

I couldn’t have said it better myself.

Joanie Mann Bunny FeetJ

original post March 24, 2011
Posted on

Cash is being spent instead of hoarded, but not on current payables

Cash is being spent instead of hoarded, but not on current payables

A recent article on CIO.com reports that, for only the second time in more than two years, “the corporate-cash indicator from the Association for Financial Professionals shows more finance executives (28%) anticipate cutting their cash hoard in the first quarter than are planning to add to it (23%).”

                Companies Plan to Trim Cash Stockpiles | In a reversal of a two-year trend, US finance executives forecast that their organizations’ cash balances will fall this quarter”..

Even more interesting from the article is what businesses ARE doing with their cash.

Although some are spending on acquisitions, more are paying down debt, buying back shares, and issuing dividends, according to Jim Kaitz, the AFP’s president and CEO. Although that suggests companies aren’t reinvesting in their businesses much, those activities are still better than keeping money in low-return cash-investment vehicles.

Okay, so it is expected that more businesses will utilize that “cash hoard” (if they have one) to pay down debt or issue dividends.  But it doesn’t seem that actually paying the bills on time is one of the things businesses are doing with all that cash.  Rather, the “new normal” when it comes to managing accounts payable is to extend that payment out as far as possible, letting the supplier carry the freight so businesses don’t have to dip into that cash pile to cover costs.

Yet another article on CIO.com, entitled When Your Big Customer Wants to Pay Late, discusses the reality that many companies are extending their trade payables to new lengths, allowing them to keep the money for other uses – essentially using their suppliers for short-term financing.  Viewed as a strategy for building cash reserves, it’s also a strategy which burdens smaller companies who aren’t in a position to carry their larger customers but feel they don’t have the power to negotiate otherwise.

Extending payables may be a way to preserve cash flow, but it isn’t really a cost-cutting measure and could even eliminate some cost benefits.  For example, a supplier may offer a discount for prepayment, and businesses looking to reduce operational costs could benefit from taking advantage of these types of discounts.  In other cases, extending payables could make the business subject to interest or late charges, resulting in either a larger bill or in time spent negotiating the charges down.

While large businesses may be building their cash reserves, or simply preserving them for reducing debt or other uses, smaller businesses should also look at the steps they can take to preserve their own cash flow – whether it is through stronger collection terms and policies, by strategically working with the client to get the payments, or by extending their own payables.

When cash is tight, every business along the supply chain wants to find ways to keep the money in their grip as long as possible.

Joanie Mann Bunny FeetMake Sense?

J