Tag: electronic information

Posted on

Bookkeeping Needs Better Reporting Tools

There are many articles and papers available which discuss the rapidly increasing “volume and velocity” of electronic information moving through businesses these days. The focus of the discussion in most cases is on how businesses need to adopt tools and solutions to help them with the management of this electronic data flow. What isn’t being discussed at length is the visceral business intelligence which is lost due to less direct interaction with the raw data.

By manually working through each item, the person regularly processing the information would often develop somewhat of a picture of the business simply through a level of intuition, a gut reaction to the information. This is a rapidly declining model, thanks to intelligent technologies and direct system integrations.

With the plethora of electronic information sources, data collection tools, and transaction download facilities, many bookkeepers and business owners are finding that their gut instinct and business intuition is being lost in the shuffle of managing and matching up all this electronic data.

Focusing on small business bookkeeping, the processes are now being oriented more towards matching up electronic transaction data points than on entering the information from the raw source. Where bookkeepers were once perceived as “mechanics” in terms of performing the bookkeeping data entry, the activities of these professionals is becoming even more mechanical in nature as the primary requirement shifts from entering the information to importing it and then matching it to source documentation.

Even decisions regarding categorization of the transaction are often made by software solutions, eliminating more involvement by the bookkeeping or accounting pro. At the same time that bookkeepers and accountants find themselves having difficulties communicating the value of the service they deliver, technology trends in the industry are weighing even more heavily on that value proposition by providing users with do-it-yourself tools and self-service solutions.

The answer to the challenge of demonstrating value in the bookkeeping and accounting processes is for accountants, bookkeepers and business owners is to focus on the result of the work rather than focusing on the work directly.

Small business owners will challenge their accountants and bookkeepers to explain why processing a limited number of transactions per period would cost much, and the professional ends up fighting a battle which cannot be won; there is far more value in the work they perform than simply entering the data. It’s this explanation of WHY bookkeeping and accounting takes skill and has value which become arguable to the business owner, and is a discussion which the accountant or bookkeeper is more likely to win if they were to in a position to provide their client with proof of this value.

Too often, accounting and bookkeeping service providers attempt to prove their worth to the client by espousing the quality, accuracy, and timeliness of their services and say too little about the value of the result they will deliver. Additionally, many professionals introduce their clients directly to the accounting software and try to engage the client to work cooperatively with the bookkeeping, as there is a perception that the client may see more value in the work if they can a) see it being done in real time and b) see how complicated it could really be.

Unfortunately the accounting and bookkeeping solutions often implemented by small businesses actually look pretty easy to use and are intuitive, which serves to even further diminish the value proposition as the client perceives that they could likely operate the software just as well as the bookkeeper.

In order to deliver the proof to the client that the bookkeeping work has value, the result becomes the focus of the effort. Rather than providing balance sheets, profit and loss statements and bank reconciliations, those involved in the bookkeeping and accounting process for the small business should also focus on reports which demonstrate the value of PROPER bookkeeping and accurately reflecting business activities.

Would the client know the real difference between cost of goods sold and a regular business expense? Reflection of that single transaction with two different treatments could be the trigger to get the light bulb to light up. How best to demonstrate the variation? Not in pure written report form, that’s for sure. Numbers alone don’t generally trigger real understanding, but painting a picture might.

Today’s dashboard and reporting tools – solutions which use information from the accounting system to reflect visual trends and representations of business performance – can deliver far more meaning and easier understanding than a columnar report with numbers and percentages. Further, these tools can address the task of revealing critical insight into business value, demonstrating (for example) the difference between cash flow and profitability, or identifying trends which indicate patterns in how the business is causing or reacting to change.

As small business owners feel continued pressure to improve performance and profitability, and as lending sources for business credit remain difficult and costly to engage, the necessity for quality bookkeeping and accounting services does not diminish, it increases. The challenge is in finding ways to read the data and discover the insight and meaning it reveals.

The value of bookkeeping and processing accounting data for businesses is ever-increasing in these days of global markets and global competition, and the forward-thinking professional will recognize that deeper insight into the business – insight enabled through the use of realtime reporting and analysis tools – delivers an ongoing opportunity to work closer with the client in addressing challenges identified and presented, and allows the accounting professional, bookkeeper and business owner to be guided by real information rather than emotion or intuition.

jmbunnyfeetMake Sense?

J

 

read the original posting at  The Progressive Accountant.

Posted on

The IRS is Spending a Lot of Money to Make a Lot of Money | cashlessandpaperless

Electronic documents and paperless solutions are supposed to help make our lives easier.  By eliminating the paper documents and working with electronic ones instead, users would be able to efficiently manage all their valuable information in one place.  Even more, this information could be shared electronically (swiftly and simply) with others.  However, as most advancements in technology have demonstrated, every solution comes with its own new set of problems.  Where accounting and taxes are concerned, tax payers and the IRS alike are dealing with the impacts of accounting for and substantiating “cashless and paperless” transactions and other activities.  It seems that the IRS is spending more time and resources (=money), expecting that a frontal assault armed with digital records will provide a basis for improved tax collections.

“If you’ve recently been involved in an IRS audit of a business, you have likely seen the agent enter the room fully prepared with copies (subpoenaed) of bank statements and other documentation. It used to be the tax payer who had to provide all the documentation, and the auditor simply used that material. These days, it has become too easy to falsify or improperly change information in electronically stored files (using Photoshop or other tools), so the IRS has lost trust in the data tax payers provide. Instead, they spend a great deal of time and resources collecting this information for themselves (because they can), and then use their copies of the data to compare the data provided by the tax payer.

The IRS will accept electronic records in lieu of original paper documents in many cases, and this is often because they have an ability to validate the content of the electronic records through comparison. Yes, the IRS can collect electronic banking information from financial institutions and other sources, just like the account holder can. It’s become more of a “guilty unless you can prove you’re innocent” approach, and puts the tax payer in a purely defensive posture. Even more, it assumes the tax payer has the sophistication and tools necessary to access and manage all of that electronic data effectively.”

read more at: The IRS is Spending a Lot of Money to Make a Lot of Money | cashlessandpaperless.

Posted on

Preparing for Disasters of the Legal Kind

Preparing for Disasters of the Legal Kind

As businesses begin to realize the benefits of cloud computing and business data mobility, they may be overlooking one of the most important issues any enterprise can face: information management in the event of litigation.  While the IT department probably has a disaster recovery plan for handling various computer system failures, is there also a plan for managing system data and electronic information in the event of a “legal disaster”?  In the spotlight is e-discovery, which is the requirement of the business to respond to legal requests for electronically stored information, and the issues CIOs and business owners should be paying attention to as computing solutions and technology models continue to change at a rapid pace.

The popularity of BYOD (Bring Your Own Device), data sync solutions, and online collaboration tools has created an environment where business data may exist in various states (meaning as in conditions or status, not as in State, like California) and on a variety of devices and systems, some of which may not be in the direct control of internal IT.  Regardless of where or how the information was delivered to these devices and systems, CIOs and business owners should recognize that the information on those devices is included in discovery requests, and should be prepared with a plan for dealing with the response.

This “e-discovery plan” is the most important thing, and it means not only working through the various aspects of managing the information, but also providing consideration to keeping the plan updated.  As technology changes, and as user behavior changes along with it, businesses must adjust their IT management approaches in kind.  Consider that a user couldn’t store business data on their phone until the phone was able to handle that function.   Now that smartphones are the norm and tablet computers are gaining in popularity, business data is roaming on personal and business devices.  These advancements may introduce productivity and process gains which provide an advantage to businesses, but they also introduce potential risk and certain complexity when it comes to e-discovery.

Litigation is always expensive, but sanctions for slow response or other costs can be avoided if the plan helps the business respond in a timely manner.  For this reason, the plan should include an identification of all sources for information (every location where business information and data is stored), as well as the steps to be taken to preserve this data in the current state.  If the business has systems which regularly purge information (like accounting systems which purge prior period details, email systems which automatically purge old emails, or backup systems which delete old backup files as new ones are made), all of these activities must be halted.  If the company doesn’t have access to control the various devices and systems to prevent these activities (or doesn’t know that they are happening), significant risk is introduced.  In the case of a legal “hold”, all data and metadata and the audit controls and files must be preserved.

The final steps in the plan are the steps to be taken after the litigation is over.  This is often times a forgotten part of the plan, which is the final destruction of the information gathered for discovery.  Not that the original data must be destroyed (consider ALL dependencies), but the “database” of collected information related to the litigation probably should be.  With this data pooled in a single place, it becomes a potentially valuable target for a data breach.  At minimum, the collected information could too-easily be pulled into an entirely new legal case.

IT managers, CIOs and business owners must be realistic about the information their enterprises generate and store, including being realistic about the risk potential that duplicated and mobile data represents.  It is not that the enterprise should be afraid of allowing mobility and providing remote access solutions, but it is essential that the enterprise control the use of these solutions and how they use or interact with business data.   Without a strictly enforced policy of usage and control for all devices, services and solutions “touching” business data, any legal disaster planning falls short.

Joanie Mann Bunny FeetMake Sense?

J

Read More:

Posted on

A Holistic Approach to Cloud IT

holistic: a. Emphasizing the importance of the whole and the interdependence of its parts.

The Internet and cloud computing solutions can help businesses create an environment which allows team members and clients to work together more efficiently; where information can be generated once and used in a variety of ways by different users.  With this new capability to share documents and files in real-time, many businesses are finding that they are generating more electronic information today than ever before – and they’re having a hard time keeping these information assets organized.  With paper documents being digitized to allow for electronic distribution, OCR, and intelligent connecting to transaction data – lots of stored data is being produced and stored in a variety of places.

There are many technology models available, so there are a lot of options for businesses today – options which address the fundamental requirements to convert, store, secure, and distribute the various data types within the enterprise.  When a business elects to use a variety of cloud solutions or providers to address a number of business problems, how does that enterprise wrap its arms around the content which represents, in all actuality, the sum of business intelligence in the enterprise?  Keeping tabs on the business data is critical, but tracking all the data when it is stored with a variety of providers may be very difficult.

Example: If your business uses an online CRM such as Salesforce.com, runs QuickBooks on your local PC, and uses Gmail for email service… exactly where does your business data live?  With Salesforce?  On your local PC?  At Google?  In all 3 places?

Containment of distributed data isn’t the only issue facing businesses today.  Longevity and long-term access to data is a concern, as well.  Solutions and providers that exist today may not exist tomorrow.  If you have data invested in a solution with a short life span (and you probably won’t know this is the case until it’s too late), you may orphan your data and not be able to access it later.   And, if you can get your data from the provider, is it in a useful form or did you lose functionality when you lost the solution?

Example:  Intuit once introduced a paperclip (attached documents service) in QuickBooks, and offered the attached document feature at no charge.  The “free” service from Intuit encouraged a lot of users to migrate from other QuickBooks-connected document management solutions. Then… Intuit announced that the attached documents service would no longer be free.  Users with the service could still get to their documents via a web portal, but not from within QuickBooks, and certainly not as attachments to transactions or other records. Then the attached documents feature was once-again changed, allowing only storage to local PCs rather than on Intuit’s servers. Then, it went away entirely. 

Another issue facing businesses operating in the cloud is one of vendor lock-in (or lock-out), and being able to address the total business requirement.  Point solutions and vendor-specific solutions may address certain business problems, but generally aren’t able to handle all of the needs of a given business.  If your online solution doesn’t address the needs of the entire business, you risk increasing production costs and reducing productivity through duplication of data entry and other activities.

Example: An accounting firm with an insurance division uses Thomson Reuters Virtual Office service, which delivers certain accounting applications along with Microsoft Office on a remote desktop type of connection.  Unfortunately for the firm, the users operating in the insurance division use applications that aren’t supported or available via the Virtual Office solution.  So, certain users have completely disconnected services – a remote desktop serving up their Office apps, and a separate browser-based solution – neither of which integrate or work together.  The complexity and confusion caused by this situation has done little more than increase the burden of duplicate data entry, recreation of documents, and constant download-save-upload activities.

In each of these cases, a “holistic” approach to cloud IT services might have produced better results than by looking at each application or functional “solution” individually.

As an example, consider that a business with in-office and mobile employees needs to use accounting, office productivity, contact management, documents storage, and several browser-based solutions in order to provide the functionality and operational support necessary.    While many of these solutions are individually available online, the business opts to work with a single outsourced IT provider to create their own “private cloud” environment.

The solution includes remote/virtual desktops, hosted accounting applications, hosted Office applications, hosted browser (to allow browser and Internet-based apps to integrate with Office and other apps on the remote desktop), hosted CRM, and hosted document management… all applications that the business selects and might even have been using for years are included.

All  applications are delivered on the remote desktop environment, providing users with the ability to open documents instantly, save and share files seamlessly, and participate in a central company-wide document store.

All applications are licensed to the business, so they have the flexibility of returning to local IT operations simply by implementing their own software in their own network and taking the data off the host.

Because all of the business data resides on this single hosting platform, the business is able to not only keep control of all information assets, but is also able to back up and protect (preserve) that data in its entirety.

Now doesn’t that make sense?

J

Learn more…