Tag: accountability

Posted on

Bankable: Giving Small Businesses Credit

Bankable: Giving Small Businesses Credit

Whether the economic environment is “friendly” or not, small businesses will turn to their banks to secure lines of credit and get funding to smooth out bumps in cash flow and availability.  Getting credit is always a challenge, even in the best of times.  When the economy stalls and times are tough, getting the necessary cash to support the business gets even tougher.

A recent post on blogs.wsj.com (Wallstreet Journal) discusses the results of a survey (Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Small Business Borrowers Poll), where it was revealed that “small-business owners in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut are still struggling to acquire credit for day-to-day expenses and expansion”.  What a surprise.  Times are tough, and the banks need to manage their risk and increase the predictability of repayment for loans and lines of credit.  If accountants are looking for reasons to adopt and implement analytics and forecasting for their clients, there you go.

Accounting professionals can help their clients get the credit they need, by helping demonstrate how “bankable” the business is.  Here are three ways to improve the odds when trying to get financing for the business (and where the accounting professional can be a pivotal player), according to an article on Bloomberg Businessweek: Three Ways to Make Your Small Business “Bankable”

1. Tighten up your books. The value of good financial reporting cannot be understated. By being able to demonstrate profitability and a strong balance sheet, you reduce the ambiguity that is often present in a small business’s financial statements. Banks look to manage their risk and increase their predictability with the loans and lines of credit they give. Owners who can do that for them will stand a better chance of getting approved.

2. Showcase your strategic thinking. Give financial institutions an idea of how your strategy will help your bottom line. Broad brush strokes won’t cut it here. Provide specifics as well as the quantitative and qualitative reasoning behind it.

3. Get some help. Although most small businesses don’t require a full time chief financial officer, many should consider hiring a reputable, outsourced accounting firm. The right one will give you a better understanding of your company finances.

Make Sense?

J

  • Read more about how accountants need business intelligence, too
  • Read more about how there’s no fear and loathing in accounting
  • Read more about the pressure on accountants to deliver more value and intelligence to their clients
  • Read more about Data Warriors: accounting in the cloud
Posted on

Should you be paying sales tax on your cloud solution?

Should you be paying sales tax on your cloud solution?

There are a lot of undefined issues relating to whether or not sales taxes should be charged and collected on “cloud” services and online applications.  Traditional approaches aren’t quite right, because there isn’t a clear delineation of what is “service” versus “product”.  For example, an online storage service may be “service”, but when you are charged for bandwidth or other elements, it starts to be more product oriented and taxation may apply.  Online applications or cloud hosted software?  In some cases, the platform may be service, but the subscribed application may be taxable software.  It’s a clouded issue for service providers and their customers, alike.

‘Kelley Miller of the law firm Reed Smith, who specializes in technology law and specifically tracks how states have been enforcing cloud taxes, says it’s been a tough issue for states. The DOR says in its ruling that the market is evolving “at a rapid pace.” Traditionally tax laws just don’t work for this new era of cloud computing, she says, because there is not a tangible transaction of a disc or piece of hardware. Massachusetts seems to have echoed findings from other states though, she says. “The essence of the question is, are you buying software that people bought in a box at the store 10 or 15 years ago,” she says. If so, then Massachusetts, and other states, have claimed a right to tax it.’

A recent article on CIO.com discusses Massachusetts rulings on the subject, joining a number of other states in attempting to bring clarity to when cloud computing services should and should not be taxed.  The decisions sound almost as complicated as the underlying issues, so “clarity” obviously doesn’t mean simplicity.

Read the entire article here

Make Sense?

J

Posted on

Is your purchasing and expense approvals process holding up your business?

Is your purchasing and expense approvals process holding up your business?

When a small business owner hears about purchase and expense tracking, they immediately think of traveling sales people needing reimbursement for plane tickets, hotel rooms, and meals.  For others, it is a process geared towards control, making sure monies aren’t being spent where they are not approved.  Either way, purchasing and expense approval processes are generally viewed as “necessary evils” of doing business, and as such are often facilitated with spreadsheets to which receipts, invoices, quotes, or other documentation is attached.  Reviewing and approving this information is generally a manual process which takes time and attention from other activities.

When times are good, when credit easy to come by and everyone is fat, no one sweats the small stuff. But times haven’t been good for a while and today the small stuff looms large, especially in small businesses trying to grow at a time when investors and customers are wary.
CFO.com (http://s.tt/1kq4O)

Yet, as with so many things in business and in life… it’s not a problem until it becomes an obvious problem.  Most businesses don’t really recognize the amount of time they invest in these types of reporting activities, much less realizing that there are bigger business benefits to be achieved if only they would leverage technology to intelligently address the process.  Redundant information entry and exchange is reduced, accuracy of expense reporting is improved, and data collection and integration eliminates the impact of re-entering  information, or time delays in manual paper-based processes.

The growing problem at Blade, Verbeck says, was not so much that money was being misspent as that the work was burning up his and the finance department’s time. Requests and invoices piled up on his desk, distracting him from more valuable tasks, while employees were either waiting to purchase the stuff they needed to do their jobs or buying and expensing it.
CFO.com (http://s.tt/1kq4O)

In a recent article on CFO.com, David Rosenbaum describes several business experiences in addressing the payables approval process, and the benefits achieved through solving what was once not recognized as a problem.  From simply reducing the amount of money spent on nonessential items, to finding cancelled contracts still being paid, a structured and intelligent approvals process can make big differences in a variety of areas.  The essential element is a structured and intelligent process and not one designed simply to factor the spend into the cash flow.

The savings that can be retrieved by automating and rationalizing approval and purchasing processes are palpable (a 2009 Aberdeen Group study estimated that “improving the percentage of all non-payroll, tax, tariff, and fee-related spend” — that is, indirect, nonstrategic expenses — brought under the management of a dedicated group can help enterprises “achieve a 5% to 20% cost savings for each dollar brought under spend management”). But the real value, says Kristen Lampert, corporate-services manager at specialty-investment bank Ziegler, is de-risking organizational spending by making sure the approval chain has the right people weighing in on the right things.

There’s an old saying that “if all you have is a hammer, then every problem looks like a nail”, and Microsoft Excel has been the hammer of choice for many businesses over the years.  However, there are some things that can (and perhaps should) be done better and more efficiently with a solution designed specifically for that purpose.  Not everything is better in a spreadsheet.

Make Sense?

J

Read the entire article on CFO.com

  • Read more about using the cloud to extend “connectedness” beyond traditional boundaries 
  • Read more about how there’s no fear and loathing in accounting
  • Read more about the pressure on accountants to deliver more value and intelligence to their clients
  • Read more about Data Warriors: accounting in the cloud
Posted on

Working With the Right Numbers: Financial Data Analysis Requires Accurate Financial Data

There is a lot of discussion these days about big data and financial data analysis.  One of the most valuable aspects of the available tools for performing financial analysis, forecasting and “what-if” scenarios is the ability for a business to benchmark their performance against other businesses in similar industries.  By comparing their performance metrics with other like businesses, an owner or manager may be able to identify items in the performance profile which could be improved or which may represent differentiation from competitors.

When speaking to accounting professionals about the additional valuable services they could be providing to clients by using these KPI reporting tools to identify additional consultation and advisory services clients need, the feedback I generally get from the professional is that “you have to get the numbers right, first”.  It seems that, even with the ready availability of powerful and affordable software solutions to run the business, accounting and finance still tends to be an afterthought for many business owners.  Relegated to the back-office, and being an after-the-fact recipient of transactional data, accounting is still viewed by many as a “necessary evil” of doing business rather than an area of potential strategic advantage.

Many accounting professionals are still struggling with finding the right approach to help clients get better financial reporting on a regular basis, in as near real time as possible, without having to practically live in the client systems.  These professionals are often still approaching the problem by attempting to get the client to participate in the financial systems directly by inputting checks and payments, creating invoices, and doing other types of work the client needs to perform – and using the accounting system to do it.

This approach may well be the source of the dilemma, and all because the client is being asked to work in the accountant’s software rather than with a solution which addresses specifically the tasks the business users need to perform on a regular basis.  When users have tools which don’t suit their requirements well, they tend to not use the tools properly, if at all.  When users are provided with tools suited specifically to solving their functional or process support problems (Service Oriented Architecture approach, or SOA – what Doug Sleeter calls “chunkify”), usage and accuracy can increase dramatically.  Getting the numbers right means getting the supporting solution right first. When these solutions are properly configured and deployed, data collection and integration can become a “stealth” process, silently passing information from one system to another, significantly improving the accuracy and quality of data.

Accounting professionals who focus on assisting their clients with applying the right solutions to support operational as well as accounting processes, and who help to create the controls around the appropriate flow of information end-to-end, are delivering very high levels of value to those client businesses.  It is the assistance these consultative professionals provide, helping the business facilitate its processes faster and more efficiently, which increases the accuracy and, ultimately, the meaning of the resulting financial data.

Make Sense?

J

Interested in learning more about tools which can help your professional practice get more opportunity from every client?  Contact me @JoanieMann on Twitter, or connect with me on LinkedIn or Facebook.

  • Read more about how accountants need business intelligence, too
  • Read more about how there’s no fear and loathing in accounting
  • Read more about the pressure on accountants to deliver more value and intelligence to their clients
  • Read more about Data Warriors: accounting in the cloud
Posted on

More Than an Accountant: A Trusted Business Advisor

More than an accountant: A Trusted Business Advisor

Accounting isn’t available for re-invention.  The rules were established long ago, and my debits and credits aren’t any better than yours.  Accurate accounting, completed tax returns, and quality audits are an expectation of every client of a professional accounting practice.  So, with accounting being somewhat of a “known quantity”, how does a firm show that it can do so much more than simply crunch the basic numbers, and demonstrate their value as a trusted business advisor? The answer is in knowing more about the client business and operation, and using that knowledge to identify opportunity for both the firm and for the client.

Accounting firms serving growing businesses must deliver value, insight, and long-term service to their clients.  These firms desire to enhance their service deliveries to existing clients and prospects, and need efficient and effective tools to support the effort.  For today’s accounting professional, that toolkit needs to include data collection, integration, and analysis.  The accounting professional’s participation in these areas is critical.  Data collection and integration efforts must be controlled in order to ensure accuracy of data in the financial systems.  This becomes the first and most important element – making certain that the data in the financial systems is accurate and complete.  Only then may additional steps be taken to add more value to the service delivery.

A primary method of adding value to accounting service delivery is to enhance the firm’s ability to provide data analysis and deep insight into business and financial performance.  This is, of course, enabled through the monitoring and control of data flowing into the financial systems, ensuring accuracy of information used for analysis. Staying abreast of changing financial needs and finding additional opportunities to add value to client deliveries is a key element in gaining new business and revenue for the firm, and adding to the “sticky” nature of the firm’s services.  Engaging with clients on key financial trends and industry performance metrics can help to set the firm apart from its competition, differentiating services and offering far more value to the client.

Financial analysis tools available today offer accounting professionals more capability and process support than ever before.  With direct integrations to practice management and engagement solutions, firms gain the ability to map and sync data automatically from core firm applications.  This ability can significantly improve upon the time and effort required to introduce data into the system, and delivers efficiency and scalability which allows the firm to easily expand use of the solution to the entire portfolio of client engagements.

There are numerous benchmarking and reporting tools today which make reading and understanding financial data easier and more accessible for business owners and managers, yet these solutions rarely address the needs of the firm in terms of mining the entire portfolio of clients for new opportunity where the firm can deliver more value and service.  The selection of the right tool for the firm becomes a key element in this respect.  The solution must deliver not only better analysis and reporting for each client, but should also be oriented to provide a system-wide view for the firm members and participants.

A key aspect to the efficient application of these tools is to systematize the activity, and structure it as a standard process within the business.  When it becomes part of a firms DNA, to structure, compare and analyze client engagements for trends and similarities and then to take advantage of the opportunities revealed therein, the firm has a practice model which speaks to sustainability and growth over time.  For smaller firms and solo practitioners, this approach is what turns individual accomplishment into a long-term business model.

The solution is out there, and it’s available today for practitioners who wish to introduce efficient and scalable ways to identify client opportunity, capture it, and deliver on it.  Turn your firm into a value machine, and deliver the trusted advice your clients need.  A little investment in this area can deliver large returns for years to come.

Make Sense?

J

Interested in learning more about tools which can help your professional practice get more opportunity from every client?  Contact me @JoanieMann on Twitter, or connect with me on LinkedIn or Facebook.

  • Read more about how accountants need business intelligence, too
  • Read more about how there’s no fear and loathing in accounting
  • Read more about the pressure on accountants to deliver more value and intelligence to their clients
  • Read more about Data Warriors: accounting in the cloud
Posted on

Data Dashboards and Financial Analysis: Comparing Apples to Aardvarks

It’s been said that the only constant is change.  Businesses are being told that having the strength and agility to meet those changes is what makes the difference between success and failure.   But in order to address change, to understand the possible outcomes in various “what-if” scenarios, a business has to understand how it is performing today, and then must capture and compare measurements over time to be able to identify trends and similarities.  Only then, when the business has the information necessary to view performance over time, is it then possible to introduce changes and forecast potential outcomes.  When the analysis includes many businesses rather than just one, even more may be revealed in terms of comparative performance levels under varying circumstances.

It doesn’t sound all that difficult, really.  Not on the surface, anyway.  There are a lot of tools and resources available now which make this type of analysis a walk in the park.  With accounting moving “online” and into connected web service, and with accounting professionals working closer than ever before with their online clientele, the data available is astounding and analytics providers are eating it up.  It’s actually possible for a small business to subscribe to a solution, upload or sync up their QuickBooks or similar financial information, and magically have a really cool dashboard to look at that makes financial statement reading obsolete.  More often than not, there’s also a feature that lets the owner compare or benchmark their performance against others in the same industry.  And that’s the problem.

Stepping back a bit, let’s now talk about XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language).  In its simplest form, XBRL can be described as an application of XML (eXtensible Markup Language) intended for use in business reporting.  The idea is that all financial reporting should be “marked” in certain standard ways, so that it is easier to compare and monitor.  XBRL is considered by many, including the AICPA, to be a “language for the electronic communication of business and financial data which is set to revolutionize business reporting around the world.” Even though it sounds logical enough, it hasn’t taken off as quickly as everyone thought.

So what does XBRL have to do with data dashboards and industry performance benchmark comparisons for those small businesses we discussed earlier?  They both suffer from the same dilemma, and that’s lack of consistency in definitions and taxonomy (categorization).

Because businesses have a lot of, um, flexibility when it comes to financial reporting, it is not unusual for the application of a single term to mean one thing to one company, and a very different thing to another.  As an example, what one company calls “operating revenues” may be what another business calls “net revenues”.   Does “inventory value” mean the same thing to a business using a FIFO costing method versus LIFO?

When you try to perform an analysis of the financial data of two companies who report or label their information differently, it makes it really difficult to trust the comparison because you may very well not be comparing the right things – apples to apples.  It may be more like apples to aardvarks. I can’t tell you that the solution is out there, because at this point I don’t think it is.  I say this because the problem starts where the data is created and initially “categorized”.  There are few standards, and even fewer that are actually implemented on any sort of broad basis.  The problem exists in the trial balance software, in the accounting products, and in those Excel spreadsheets everyone carries around with them.

The best, first step any accounting professional can take with their clients is to make every attempt to address the financial reporting in a standardized manner, and capture and categorize the data appropriately from the get-go.  It’s the only way you’ll avoid spending days with Excel spreadsheets and working papers, attempting to normalize client data into a framework that is available for a useful and trusted comparative analysis.

cropped-jmbunnyfeet1Make Sense?

J

Interested in learning more about tools which can help your professional practice get more opportunity from every client?  Contact me @JoanieMann on Twitter, or connect with me on LinkedIn or Facebook.

  • Read more about how accountants need business intelligence, too
  • Read more about how there’s no fear and loathing in accounting
  • Read more about the pressure on accountants to deliver more value and intelligence to their clients
  • Read more about Data Warriors: accounting in the cloud