Category: saas

Posted on

Changing How We See Software: QuickBooks 2013 interface frustrates power users

Changing How We See Software:

QuickBooks 2013 interface frustrates power users

You’re an accounting, bookkeeping or business professional and have been working with QuickBooks desktop software for years.  Your processes and methods for using QuickBooks to manage client accounting have been developed over time, and have been refined to the point where you are able to maximize your efforts and efficiently handle all your customer requirements.   Sure, there have been changes in the software over the years, and many of them have proven to be helpful.  But sometimes you have to wonder what they were thinking when they changed the interface for 2013.

Initially I thought it was the grumbling of a few people who simply resist change, some admittedly so.  But then the grumbling got louder, and started to come from folks I would expect to hear only “happy rainbows and sunshine” from when it comes to QuickBooks.  The new interface, they say, “sucks”.

So what’s the issue?  What did Intuit do with QuickBooks 2013 desktop editions that has inflamed so many devoted users?  One ProAdvisor puts it this way: “Basically no real enhancements at all, just the interface and relocation of options”.  In short, QuickBooks desktop editions now look a bit more like QuickBooks Online Edition, and “there’s extra stuff in the navigation – Intuit stuff“.

I understand Intuit’s motivations for making the desktop and online editions appearance more similar.  After all, the benefit of the QuickBooks product line is that you can start with an entry-level edition and move up the product line to more features and functionality without converting to and learning entirely new software.  Since the online edition of QuickBooks is positioned as the entry-level product for some businesses, it makes sense to continue that same look for the user as they upgrade to richer desktop editions.  Unfortunately for many accounting and bookkeeping professionals, this means giving up on some of the usability you’ve come to expect (like being able to fit all the necessary information on the screen, and having easy-to-read menus, or not seeing a lot of unusable space on the screen, or even being able to suppress Intuit in-product offers).

Many companies have successfully increased their revenue potential by adding offers for services via links in the software interface, which is much more acceptable now that people have adopted web technologies and are familiar with the “hyperlink” concept.  Building additional value (and revenue streams) in the solution makes sense from a business perspective, which is why you see so many software companies moving in this direction.  Software solutions and services can interconnect seamlessly and transparently via the web, so we should all expect to see software makers engage their customers in as many ways and with as many products and services as possible.  For Intuit, this means being positioned to take advantage of, initially, their partner network of interconnected solutions and, later, their own direct offerings in each area.

Software developers like Intuit DO listen to their users and market influencers, as they value your continued patronage.  They have come to learn, however, that devoted (or invested) users will accept change eventually – even more so when there is a chance to use the change to generate business opportunity.  QuickBooks accountants and trainers rely on change in order to keep their clients coming back for more.

The real target is the new user – the business not already adopted into the product – and it is primarily for this new user that the interface changes were made and in-product advertisements targeted to.

In the case of Intuit’s interface selection for QuickBooks 2013 desktop editions, it might seem like there’s “no enhancement, just the interface change”.  I would suggest, however, that the interface change IS the enhancement Intuit elected to deliver – enhancement of the acceptance of the online edition and connected services.

Make Sense?

J

Check out buildingup.biz and see what we’re up to these days

Posted on

Mobility and the Cloud – Managing “Bring Your Own Device” and Securing Company Resources

There are lots of reasons why businesses are adopting cloud and Internet technologies in great number, and supporting mobile workers is one of the big ones.  In order for traveling sales people or workers in remote offices to have access to business applications and data, many organizations are turning to hosted and cloud solutions to centralize systems and make enterprise-wide access easier to deliver and manage.

What many businesses are just now realizing, however, is that allowing individuals to use their own mobile devices to access corporate data is exposing the enterprise to new (and often unknown) risk with each and every device and app that gets used.

Most businesses recognize the need to secure corporate systems while allowing users to remotely access resources from home or mobile computers.

Many CIOs and IT managers are failing to address the vulnerabilities introduced through the proliferation of tablets and smartphones in the business. Some enterprises initially embraced the concept of “bring your own device” [BYOD], as it tended to encourage users to work from home or while on the road, increasing employee productivity and keeping workers more “attached” to their jobs – all without the business having to pay for the device.

With growing numbers of reported “rogue apps” and apps that secretly collect and pass data, the potential benefits of allowing workers to use their own devices is rapidly being overshadowed by the risks involved.

Earlier this year, Apple, Facebook, Yelp and several other firms were sued for privacy-infringing apps that, among other things, pillaged users’ address books. …but what if the app uploads a sales representatives’ contact list and the developer then sells it to a competitor? That’s a new type of data leakage that most organizations aren’t ready for.

http://www.cio.com/article/716368/Free_Mobile_Apps_Put_Your_BYOD_Strategies_at_Risk  

Phones, in particular, have not traditionally been viewed by most business owners as a primary platform for information theft or damage – other than when an employee uses one to tell someone something they shouldn’t.  But in terms of intrusion, data theft, application hacking and things like that… not so much.

But that was before phones got really smart.

Phones that most folks carry around now are actually computers with a great deal of processing and storage capacity, and as such are just as capable of running bad programs and being vulnerable to attack as their more obvious portable computer counterparts.  Perhaps they are even more vulnerable because of the “connected” nature of the device, because by its very nature it is geared towards communication of information, not just processing it.

It’s not that hackers and developers of exploits (or just bad code) are necessarily focusing on stealing your business data (well, OK, a lot of them are).  Maybe someone just got lucky one day, when they first realized that the employee phone was the “camel’s nose under the tent” which would get them inside, far enough to deliver access to confidential corporate information and data someone would pay for.  People tend to be the weakest element in the security chain, and exploiting vulnerabilities under the guise of “making things easier” for the user has been a highly successful approach (would you like to sign in with your Facebook account?).

..because attacks that target employees may well end up targeting the employer as well, even if the employer wasn’t the original target.

Whether it is intentional or not, the risk is very present, and every business and enterprise has a responsibility to recognize the vulnerabilities introduced with mobile device use and to do what it can to mitigate that risk.  It is also important to recognize that the risk is not a purely personal one, either.

Since the information held by most businesses also includes the information of others – customers, vendors, partners, etc. – it is essential that the business not expose itself to unnecessary problems (litigation, fines or penalties, or simply lost opportunity) caused by accidental leakage of confidential information belonging to 3rd parties.

For some businesses, the best answer may be to only allow use of devices the business provides, along with clearly written use policies and guidelines.  This approach allows the organization to determine which applications may be installed and to dictate how the device is to be used for business needs.

There are even solutions available which can assist businesses in managing the expenses related to mobile devices in the enterprise, addressing not only security and privacy concerns but also helping to optimize expenditures on mobile devices by monitoring contracts and usage, identifying underused agreements or overage charges, or even identifying contracts still in force which should have been cancelled.

For many businesses, however, allowing users to continue accessing business resources with their personal devices may be desirable for a variety of reasons, cost being only one of them.  If this is the case (as it is most often in small and growing businesses), it is important to make certain that users understand what is and is not appropriate device use, and to inform users on the policies relating to apps which may or may not be allowed and why.

Make sense?

J

Posted on

Turn Risk into Opportunity: Focusing on Value and Supporting Profitability

Turn Risk into Opportunity:

Focusing on Value and Supporting Profitability

Most businesses accept that they have “customers”, people who pay for the products and/or services that the business provides.  However, the customer many businesses fail to recognize is the “internal” customer – the consumer of services delivered internally to the organization.  These customers, most frequently recognized as co-workers and team members, depend upon the services delivered to them in order to do their jobs for the company.  This dependency represents the value of the service, and every organization has a need to get as much value as possible for the cost they expend for these services.  When the business approaches these internally delivered services as profit centers rather than pure cost centers, the impact to the business could highly beneficial as the application of resources gets focused on building strategic benefit for the company and not simply on supporting status quo.

Calling a part of the business a profit center doesn’t mean it’s going to sell services externally for money.  Rather, it means that the activities of the department can have a direct and meaningful impact to business profitability, and are participants in the development and facilitation of business strategy.  Profit centers can come in many flavors in a business, and may be identified as managers and owners reflect on areas of the business where changing conditions may introduce business risk.  Risk often translates to opportunity at some level.

A fairly obvious example of this is in the placement of IT departments and services within an organization.  If information technology is viewed purely as a cost-center and a “necessary evil” of doing business, it is more likely that IT services will have a perceived higher cost and lower level of value, as the technology is not considered a player in business strategy.  When technology is leveraged more directly to realize the strategic vision of the business, and is applied in ways which assist in delivering higher levels of service at a reduced cost while providing a means for market differentiation, the positive impacts in efficiency and profitability can be great.

A not-so-obvious example of a cost center which could be re-oriented towards increasing strategic positioning while making a positive improvement in internal service delivery (resulting in increases in performance and profitability) is the area of sales tax compliance.  Particularly with the emerging complexities introduced with cloud and Internet services, and with the lack of standards being the only consistency across the country, sales tax compliance is becoming a significant consideration and risk factor for businesses seeking to adopt cloud services and SaaS application solutions.

“Don’t just think of the tax department as a compliance shop,” says Waterfield. “It should also be considered a profit center. If given the proper resources, and access to information, it can provide the company the ability to become competitive in the marketplace either from assistance in calculating the proper price point or reducing overall tax expense on purchases.”
CFO.com (http://s.tt/1n56t)

Unless the tax compliance department is a direct participant in the consideration and adoption of cloud IT and other services, the business could end up with a significant liability and risk exposure that was not expected or allowed for.  Rather than finding this out after the fact, reviewing these types of potential impacts should be part of that same process which considered the adoption of the solution in the first place.

Accounting and tax professionals can find additional value to deliver to their existing and prospective clients by placing focus on these very important aspects of operating and managing a business.  As technology and globalization introduce more, and more complicated, issues relating to sales taxes and reporting compliance (which even the smallest of businesses must address) accounting and tax professionals should help their clients meet these changing requirements by offering proactive consultative guidance and support.

Make sense?

J

Read more about Should you be paying sales tax on your cloud solution?

Read more about Cloud FAQs for CFOs: CFO.com

Posted on

Smarter Online Document Vaults: Document Management for QuickBooks, Microsoft Office and more

Smarter Online Document Vaults

Document Management for QuickBooks, Microsoft Office and more

Document management used to be just about storing and retrieving files.  Being able to easily store document images and other files, and then quickly finding them when you need them, is an important aspect of business record keeping.  If you are an accounting or bookkeeping professional offering outsourced services to clients, having a secure way to store and manage client document files from a variety of sources is key to developing workflows and standardizing service delivery.   Invoices, bills, bank statements, and all the other paperwork which is generated by various business processes must be captured, accounted for, and retained for future reference and documentation support.  With all of this going on, having a secure and easy way to handle all that paper and computer-generated reporting is really important.

Using an electronic document management system isn’t really that much different from dealing with paper filing systems, at least in terms of the process.  You obtain the document, you translate it into a journal entry or transaction, and then you file the document away for later use.  The difference is simply that the document becomes digital image data and is stored electronically, instead of keeping the paper file around.   And, the earlier in the process where you can turn paper documents into digital images, the better, because it reduces the need for “paper-based” processes which take more time and resources, and which may introduce risk of information loss or damage.

In an outsourced bookkeeping arrangement, for example, allowing the client to convert paper to image files is highly desirable as it prevents the outsourcer from having to travel to client offices to obtain paperwork, and reduces the time involved either with traveling to and from client locations or time spent waiting for mailed information to arrive.  For the client to handle this process willingly, or with any frequency, tools which are simple to understand and use must be supplied.   Scanning a document, saving it to the hard drive, and then trying to find the file to upload later to an accountant “portal” is not a simple process and it is not efficient.  If the user is somewhat nontechnical (most business owners?), or if there is a lot of paperwork to scan and upload, that multi-step process just won’t work for the client.

SmartVault, a solution for QuickBooks-connected and general purpose document management, has an elegant solution to the problem, and it’s called the “InBox”.   Just like the inbox on your desk, the SmartVault InBox is where new documents arrive to be processed. The ingenious part is that the InBox is a little applet that gets installed on the client workstation, and provides them with a very simple way to scan files directly to SmartVault.  The accountant or bookkeeper then accesses the client files from the inbox and processes and/or attaches them to QuickBooks transactions as required.  The client has only to perform the simple task of telling the SmartVault InBox app to obtain documents fed into the scanner.  No local file saving and retrieval required.  For the accountant or bookkeeper, the inbox is the first stop in the workflow, and is the place they go to obtain whatever information the client has provided.  The SmartVault InBox can also be used to return files easily and securely to clients, bypassing the need to have the client access and log in to a website in order to get the files (but a website portal is also part of the system, just in case the client prefers this method).  If providing seamless service and easy to follow procedures describes how you work with your clients, then SmartVault could become a key element in your service delivery.

Affordability and ease of use are important factors to consider when looking for document management solutions for small businesses.  In addition, having the ability to store documents from popular small business applications allows users to centrally store and manage all their business documents and files, not just those related to accounting.  When users wear many “hats” in the business, and need access to a variety of document types, a centralized filing system is an absolute necessity.  SmartVault addresses this by providing direct integration with Microsoft Outlook, Results CRM, and a variety of other popular small business solutions.

Oriented for use by small businesses and the accountants and bookkeepers who serve them, SmartVault delivers a surprisingly powerful solution which addresses the variety of document storage, attachment and retrieval requirements of most businesses, coupled with the workflow tools and a unique QuickBooks integration capability to specifically address the needs of accounting and finance department users.  You know you need to work smarter and not harder, so your document vault should be smarter, too.

Make Sense?

J

Posted on

Bringing Order to Inefficient Business Processes: Give people easy to use tools that make sense, and they’ll use them.

Give people easy to use tools that make sense, and they’ll use them.

Most businesses need a little help streamlining those frustrating back-office processes that remain as barriers to better information collection and use.  What sort of processes?  Time keeping, for whatever reason or need, is one of them.  Maybe employee time spent relates specifically to billable project revenue, or possibly time spent is part of an embedded cost in an engagement.  Or, time tracking may simply be a means to capture data on employee productivity.  In a lot of situations, getting time records from contractors or employees is like asking them to move a mountain.  Maybe there is a mountain to move, depending on how many sheets of notes and handwritten records they’ve got stacked up.

Another process to look at is expense management and reporting, where all those random size receipts taped to a piece of letter paper, credit card statements with lines blacked out with a Sharpie, and spreadsheets of purchase requisitions for things you’ve never heard of before get stacked in the in-box where you not-so-secretly hope a fire will start some time during the night.  Someone actually has to go through this information and enter it into the system, and then decide what to do with the requests.  When this “someone” is the owner or manager, it means taking time away from actually running the business.  When it’s the bookkeeper, more focus may be placed on data entry than on verifying spending authorizations or managing the cash flow.

While almost every business has these time and expense management needs in their business, it is an area of automation and “tooling up” that is often overlooked.   One of the reasons for this may be that a lot of the solutions users are asked to implement just aren’t “usable” enough, or don’t really fit the context of what the user needs to accomplish.  In order to get the most value out of any business solution, workers must actually use the solution.  It has been proven time and again that, if you give people easy tools that make sense, they’ll use them.

Your accounting software may have time tracking with it, but does it make sense for your employees to access accounting just to record their time?  How about your contractors?  Employee reimbursable expenses paid by credit card can be accessed directly via transaction downloads from the bank, but does it make sense for you to have access to the employee’s account?  While there may be many ways to accomplish these tasks, there are only a few really effective ways which deliver the access as well as the security, and the relevant functionality that makes it easier for good workers to capture good data.  Selecting a system with the right functionality is key, but finding a system people can and will actually use means you’ve found a real solution, not just a system.

Make Sense?

J

Posted on

Discussion on hosted service options at The Sleeter Group ASC 2012

Discussion on hosted service options at The Sleeter Group ASC 2012

Are you having a hard time understanding the best approach to hosting your business applications – wondering why it costs what it costs, and why some applications seem harder to get hosted than others?  While installing applications on your desktop seems pretty straightforward, it may seem like nothing short of rocket science to get an application installed with your hosting provider.  And, to make matters worse, a handy little software widget you just bought for $20 now means you must have your own entire virtual server just to run it in the cloud? What’s up with that?

There is a lot of confusion regarding application hosting services, what customers expect from them, and what service providers are reasonably able to deliver.  Unfortunately, software developers, customers and service providers are not always on the same page when it comes to trying to solve the problem or making it easier for businesses to adopt the service.

To attempt to address the issue, and to (hopefully) provide some clarity and guidance around the application hosting service model and its use in your business, I will be presenting a session on application hosting, including QuickBooks hosting, at the 2012 Accounting Solutions Conference, presented by the Sleeter Group and being held this year in Anaheim, California on October 22-24.  The discussion will include information on typical hosting provider models, as well as application issues and considerations businesses should be aware of when looking to have their software and systems delivered by a 3rd party.

In all fairness, I will not be recommending specific providers, nor will I suggest that any one provider is better than another.  Each hosting company has their own strengths and weaknesses, which is true with all businesses.  The focus of the session is helping attendees learn what they need to know to begin a basic evaluation of whether or not hosting of their applications makes sense, and to recognize those factors which will impact cost, performance, and usability.  Further, I’ll also be talking about how hosting isn’t a standalone solution, and how cloud-based applications and services may be combined with hosted application services to deliver the necessary functionality for the best value (“can you say chunkify!” to use a Doug-ism).

So, I guess you need to come to Anaheim in October to learn some stuff, and then take a day at Disneyland.

Make sense?

J

Get ASC 2012 conference session information here

read more about the confusion over hosted licensing on The Progressive Accountant http://www.theprogressiveaccountant.com/tech-tips/confusion-over-hosted-licensing.html