Category: business finance

Posted on

Online Accountants and Their Clients: Working Smarter, or just Closer?

Online Accountants and Their Clients: Working Smarter, or just Closer?

There are a wide variety of ways to work closer with your clients, and the thing that you will always want to remember is that “one size does not fit all”.  In other words, not every client will like using your favorite technology or software, and not every business owner will recognize your suggestions as solutions, because perhaps they did not recognize the problem in the first place.  But that’s OK, and perhaps how it should be.  You see, using the right tool for any given situation is the proper approach, rather than trying to shoehorn everyone into the same solution or method.  With a client-centric approach, you can still develop consistent internal processes to keep your service delivery as efficient as possible, because many of the core services you provide are consistent across the client base regardless of the solution in use.  The trend is to help your client work smarter, and it will bring you closer to the client than ever before.

Determining what is right for each job or task should be part of your value, whether it’s deciding how to connect remotely with your client, or helping your client find the right software system to support their tasks, with you ensuring that the integration to the accounting system is there and working properly.  Where the focus was once placed on accurate data entry, now it’s on placing the proper solution in front of the user, and through the use of the solution to perform their various tasks, the necessary data is collected. Accounting professionals should recognize that the collection of information in real time facilitates better business decision making, and that they can be instrumental in delivering this decision support resource to their client.

As an example, I know the owner of a small construction business.  This guy runs around with estimates, invoices, receipts, and other paperwork in his truck, and getting him to stop long enough for his bookkeeper to collect all that paper from the truck cab is one of the hardest and most annoying jobs she has.  Her focus is on collecting the paper and then entering the data and getting invoices and reports out.  The accountant is frequently requesting more information or clarification of data, as well as the information necessary to meet various reporting deadlines.  Even after implementing QuickBooks accounting in the office for this business, the ultimate problem wasn’t solved.  Certainly, the information is better-organized and accounted for once collected and entered, but the business owner still lacks timely information about the performance of his business, and sees little additional value in his accountants participation beyond the annual tax return.

On the other hand, I know another guy (landscaping this time) who has an accountant that has him use his phone to record just about everything he does as he does it.  He bids a job, and sends it via email.  He gets paid for a job, then snapshots a copy of the check and deposits it.  Buying equipment or supplies?  Sure, but electronic payment and approval tools let him track that as it happens, too (again, snapshot a copy of that receipt, etc.).  For this business owner, there is more business going on because less time is being spent doing the paperwork of business.  The bookkeeper in the office has the information necessary to keep things up to date, and can focus on how to streamline things even better.  The accountant has a much higher quality of information – faster – upon which to advise the client (which he has time to do, because he’s not cleaning up bookkeeping data or collecting information for reports and returns).  This business owner sees much more value in the participation by his accountant, because real issues are able to be identified and addressed in time to make a difference.

So, for today’s accounting professional, bookkeeper or consultant: is the idea of “working closer” with your client simply the concept of working remotely on the same systems at any given time, or is it to know more about their business and to help them do business better?

Make Sense?

J

Read more about Data Warriors: Accountants in the Cloud

Read more about using the cloud to extend “connectedness” beyond traditional boundaries

Posted on

Cloud FAQs for CFOs: CFO.com

There’s an amazing article on CFO.com called Cloud FAQs for CFOs and every business owner, manager, accountant, CFO and CIO should read it.

Here is one of my favorite Q/As from the article:

“Q: But I’m a finance officer, not a technologist. Can you guarantee that the total cost of ownership for the cloud is lower than what I’m already spending for my on-premises IT?
That depends upon what you’re already spending. Do you know?

According to Forrester senior analyst Dave Bartoletti, most companies are not all that good at knowing how much it really costs to run an application because IT departments “are still seen as cost centers.” The company buys the servers, the storage, and the applications, and flips the switch. “What does it cost to run?” Bartoletti asks rhetorically. “Who knows? You just depreciate the assets over a certain amount of time and after they’re fully depreciated, you buy more.” Even organizations that account for staff costs, maintenance, energy — all the indirect spend that goes into producing a service the business needs to run — will probably not be able to cost out individual applications with any degree of accuracy. How much, for example, does your e-mail cost? “If your CIO can’t tell you it’s x, y, z, per box,” Hotels and Resorts CIO Mike Blake tells CFO, “that’s a problem.”

“Enterprises are making significant investments in cloud technology in pursuit of lower costs,” says Dave Zabrowski, founder and CEO of Cloud Cruiser, a provider of cost analytics for cloud consumers, but “if you can’t see what you’re spending, there’s a good chance you’re spending too much.”

And that problem, that financial black box, has been the bane of the finance officer’s life in the IT age. The cloud, if nothing else, presents an opportunity to open that black box”

 Read more on CFO.com (http://s.tt/1jGJU)

Make sense?

J

read more about the confusion over hosted licensing on The Progressive Accountant http://www.theprogressiveaccountant.com/tech-tips/confusion-over-hosted-licensing.html

Posted on

Is your purchasing and expense approvals process holding up your business?

Is your purchasing and expense approvals process holding up your business?

When a small business owner hears about purchase and expense tracking, they immediately think of traveling sales people needing reimbursement for plane tickets, hotel rooms, and meals.  For others, it is a process geared towards control, making sure monies aren’t being spent where they are not approved.  Either way, purchasing and expense approval processes are generally viewed as “necessary evils” of doing business, and as such are often facilitated with spreadsheets to which receipts, invoices, quotes, or other documentation is attached.  Reviewing and approving this information is generally a manual process which takes time and attention from other activities.

When times are good, when credit easy to come by and everyone is fat, no one sweats the small stuff. But times haven’t been good for a while and today the small stuff looms large, especially in small businesses trying to grow at a time when investors and customers are wary.
CFO.com (http://s.tt/1kq4O)

Yet, as with so many things in business and in life… it’s not a problem until it becomes an obvious problem.  Most businesses don’t really recognize the amount of time they invest in these types of reporting activities, much less realizing that there are bigger business benefits to be achieved if only they would leverage technology to intelligently address the process.  Redundant information entry and exchange is reduced, accuracy of expense reporting is improved, and data collection and integration eliminates the impact of re-entering  information, or time delays in manual paper-based processes.

The growing problem at Blade, Verbeck says, was not so much that money was being misspent as that the work was burning up his and the finance department’s time. Requests and invoices piled up on his desk, distracting him from more valuable tasks, while employees were either waiting to purchase the stuff they needed to do their jobs or buying and expensing it.
CFO.com (http://s.tt/1kq4O)

In a recent article on CFO.com, David Rosenbaum describes several business experiences in addressing the payables approval process, and the benefits achieved through solving what was once not recognized as a problem.  From simply reducing the amount of money spent on nonessential items, to finding cancelled contracts still being paid, a structured and intelligent approvals process can make big differences in a variety of areas.  The essential element is a structured and intelligent process and not one designed simply to factor the spend into the cash flow.

The savings that can be retrieved by automating and rationalizing approval and purchasing processes are palpable (a 2009 Aberdeen Group study estimated that “improving the percentage of all non-payroll, tax, tariff, and fee-related spend” — that is, indirect, nonstrategic expenses — brought under the management of a dedicated group can help enterprises “achieve a 5% to 20% cost savings for each dollar brought under spend management”). But the real value, says Kristen Lampert, corporate-services manager at specialty-investment bank Ziegler, is de-risking organizational spending by making sure the approval chain has the right people weighing in on the right things.

There’s an old saying that “if all you have is a hammer, then every problem looks like a nail”, and Microsoft Excel has been the hammer of choice for many businesses over the years.  However, there are some things that can (and perhaps should) be done better and more efficiently with a solution designed specifically for that purpose.  Not everything is better in a spreadsheet.

Make Sense?

J

Read the entire article on CFO.com

  • Read more about using the cloud to extend “connectedness” beyond traditional boundaries 
  • Read more about how there’s no fear and loathing in accounting
  • Read more about the pressure on accountants to deliver more value and intelligence to their clients
  • Read more about Data Warriors: accounting in the cloud
Posted on

Compliance in the Cloud – Their System; Your Responsibility

Can you outsource compliance to the cloud?

Outsourcing IT to a cloud service provider can be tremendously beneficial for a business.  The model allows an organization to offload not just IT infrastructure costs, but also the costs associated with developing and maintaining all of the practices and processes involved in managing and maintaining the infrastructure and systems.   There is tremendous responsibility in handling everything from platforms and infrastructure to creating best practices for maintenance, management of scalability and growth, forecasting bandwidth requirements, implementing and monitoring security compliance, creating effective and comprehensive disaster recovery plans, and more.

The question which begs to be asked is whether or not HIPAA, PCI/DSS or any other compliance requirements, and the complexities, risk and legalities that come along with them, can also be outsourced to the CSP. For that matter, can any real level of responsibility be fully outsourced, where the liability for non-performance or noncompliance is also fully shifted?

Ummm. No. It is still your problem.

What too many companies really don’t understand is that they aren’t eliminating risk by moving to the cloud, and the requirement to meet various compliance requirements really can’t be outsourced. Particularly in this area, businesses need to recognize that outsourcing certain functions doesn’t reduce or eliminate responsibility or liability.  Just the converse, it could make things a bit more difficult if you don’t keep close tabs on how the provider implements and is involved with your solution. Even beyond that, what is the impact to the business operation when requirements are not met?  Cost recovery from the provider may be one option, but how does that help the business remain operating in the meantime?

“Gramm-Leach-Bliley (GLB) Act  Requires financial organizations to enter into contracts with third parties that they share their customer information with (including cloud vendors) to ensure that the third-party handles that information securely. Executives of those financial organizations can be held personally liable for failure to do so.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)  Defines specific security mandates and requirements for financial reporting to protect shareholders and the public from accounting errors and fraudulent practices. SOX dictates which records are to be stored and for how long and requires the data owner to know the location of the data in the cloud and to maintain control of it. Failure to comply can result in fines and/or imprisonment.”

source: CIO.com

This discussion Isn’t limited just to compliance with regulations (at least it shouldn’t be)

In this conversation we need to also address what a business should do in terms of protecting and preserving its information assets (data!) even beyond what the CSP offers. Keeping confidential and private information secure and protecting the data of the business (and clients or patients or other entities) is essential, even when the CSP fails in its obligations or abilities.  This aspect of disaster recovery and continuity planning is not often considered by the CSP yet remains critical to the business customer. The sales pitch, however, never really delves into this area, because it represents an aspect of service coverage that the provider simply can’t provide.

Illustrating this particularly difficult aspect of outsourcing to the cloud is the hard lesson learned by customers of a QuickBooks hosting provider who experienced a severe outage due to a ransomware attack. The hosting service provider promised customers it backed up their data and it did, but the backup archives were also compromised.  In order to restore service, customers were expected to have their own backups of the cloud-hosted data.

While there may have been items in the service agreement which address these issues, I can say – based on a great deal of experience in just this area – the service providers rarely make this point very clear to customers, and more frequently tell customers backing up their data is no longer something they need to really worry about. It’s like that really tiny type at the bottom of a contract that nobody notices until it is too late.

“..restoration proved more difficult in Texas. Lezama explained that for the Texas clients, the backups had been compromised as well, because their backup data had synchronized with corrupt files. But Cloudnine clients are obligated backup their own data as well, as a sort of third-level security measure..”

source: AccountingToday

With compliance in the cloud, it’s their system, but your responsibility.

Outsourcing IT to a cloud service provider in no way eliminates or reduces the obligations of the business to manage certain aspects of information systems and data.  What outsourcing can do is deliver a greater operational capacity and agility more affordably.

The responsibilities to establish information and systems management practices and processes remain firmly with the business, and actually represent a strategic component of the business that is unwise to outsource anyway. Resilience in a business and its ability to conform to regulatory and other requirements are the foundations of sustainability. Remember that cloud providers and services can be leveraged to improve certain cost and system performance metrics, but it remains solely with the business customer to find ways to reduce risk and create a greater assurance of continued operational capability.

Make Sense?

J

Posted on

In Bookkeeping, Accounting, and Information Technology: The Value of Outsourcing

The Value of Outsourcing

The small-business market, unlike the mid- and enterprise markets, utilize the general services of public accountants in much greater volume and typically for more fundamental business services – such as business bookkeeping and daily process support. Larger organizations typically employ accounting and bookkeeping departments and/or in-house personnel, and rely on outside accounting professionals for higher-level work. Small businesses, on the other hand, want to hand off much more of the core bookkeeping and checkbook management functions to their public accountant. This creates a volume of fairly mechanical work which can be burdensome and not terribly profitable for many CPA firms. But this level of work is of significant value to the small business owner, and thus the value of outsourcing to the accounting professional should be clear.

CPA firms started to step away from bookkeeping activities (this is in the 1980’s or so), reserving their time for compliance, audits, and other engagements referred to as the “higher level work”.  As business accounting became more complex (largely due to advances in information management technologies as well as accounting and tax regulations, which generated a LOT more detailed information to “account” for), many professional firms saw a need to focus on their core offerings, and not on the lower level bookkeeping and record keeping activities.  As a result, the emerging cottage industry of bookkeeping service providers grew in power and numbers, and came to represent a critical intermediary between the CPA and the small business owner.  Truly, bookkeepers and software consultants are often the folks who help to automate the processes, capture the information, and organize the data so that it is useful to the accountant.

The issue that revealed itself was that small businesses started to pay more attention to the technology and business solution advice and direction of their bookkeepers and consultants than the advice of the CPA.  In a lot of cases, the CPA kept an arm’s length from the business, concerning themselves with their tasks, and not paying significant attention to how the data is collected or controlled.  As long as they got the data, that was OK.  As the reality started to set in, that bookkeeping and information management consulting also delivered the “higher level” accounting work, CPAs once again sought a means to gain more direct participation in the client business… but through a somewhat less direct manner than previous.  Now, partnering was revealing itself as the means to more fully engage the business, and the bookkeeper or consultant, in the overall accounting value chain, resulting with the delivery of work as well as value back to the accounting professional.

The enabler of this value chain, where the accounting professional, the bookkeeper, and the business owner can all work in concert without limitations in systems or based on location, is the cloud.  Providing standardization in terms of data platforms and integration, offering mobility and device independence, and combining resource management and access into a comprehensive approach to solving business problems is enabled through cloud technologies and connected solutions and services.

For many, this concept of fully technology-enabled business seems frightening, like a loss of control or individual accountability.  But it’s important to recognize that, as things become more complex, the opportunity for specialists is always created.  In the ever changing world of technology, it’s a dangerous approach to believe that you can be all things to all people, just as in accounting or tax.  You can’t be a specialist in every area, so you specialize in your niche, do it better than anyone else, and outsource/partner to get the rest done.  This is a philosophy of the cloud, and it’s working.

The true value of outsourcing, whether it is a small business outsourcing their bookkeeping and accounting to a public accountant, an accounting professional outsourcing bookkeeping work to a bookkeeping provider/partner, or those businesses outsourcing information technology management to cloud solution providers, the end-result can include improved focus on the core business, greater agility in embracing and adjusting to new strategies, improved quality of information through attention to process and control, and a much higher level of value delivered to all participants in the value chain.

Make Sense?

J


Posted on

The Cloud is Not the End of ERP

With the emergence and general acceptance of “cloud” technologies and services, many in the information technology industry have begun to wonder if the traditional approach to enterprise software – the ERP solution – is nearing its useful life.  Is this the end of ERP?  Well, the hype sometimes becomes the reality, and businesses are moving in droves to software-as-a-service to find the cost and efficiency benefits promoted in the sales materials, and they’re finding them.  Look at Sage’s acquisition of Intacct as an expression of increased focus on cloud-based solutions. This activity around the cloud and cloud-based software-as-a-service represents a major change in how people access and consume information technology and business services, a change that’s being driven by the huge momentum of the overall growth of “cloud”.  The market is moving to a customer-centric subscription model, where the legacy approach was more in tune with the “purchase it once and use it forever” mentality, and customer relationships were largely centered on upgrade cycles.

“As an economy and a culture, we are rapidly moving away from owning tangible goods and, instead, gravitating towards becoming members of services that provide us with experiences  – such as listening to a song, using a car, watching a movie or collaborating with our colleagues.

Of course, this cultural transformation has profound implications for business models. Why? Success is no longer gauged by counting how many units of your product you have sold. Rather, success is measuring how many customers are using your service on a recurring basis and how successful you are monetizing those recurring relationships.”

Forbes.com guest post written by Tien Tzuo http://www.forbes.com/sites/ciocentral/2012/02/09/the-end-of-erp/

While it sounds like the cloud is the right approach for everyone, looking at the variety of real business situations in the market suggests that, as always, one size does not fit all, and more “traditional” ERP solutions may well continue to be the right foundation for many enterprise operations.  Particularly when considering that many businesses already significant investments in platforms and infrastructure, software and data integrations, and operational process support, cloud software solutions may not provide the necessary functionality to support existing business.  Further, integrations that may be available and supported with legacy systems are often not available with cloud-based counterparts, while different integrations based on cloud standards may be present.

For smaller businesses and those in emerging markets, subscription-based IT models may make more sense, especially as popular traditional software makers have introduced their cloud-based counterparts which will likely incorporate the features or functionality of their legacy systems, while taking advantage of the capabilities introduced through cloud integration and interoperability standards.  Strong consideration should still be given to “traditional” ERP solutions, however, as there may be a level of stability, usability, or process support desirable by the business.

Utilizing these traditional ERP systems does not mean eliminating the potential for the business to benefit from cloud solutions.  Rather, cloud platforms and hosting solutions, as well as cloud-based integrations and extensions, are enabling mobility and collaboration around legacy systems, delivering cost and efficiency benefits just as significantly as those who have adopted a full-on “cloud” approach.

“It also makes sense to explore “edge” investments. […] there are significant innovation opportunities outside of core operations. Look to take advantage of the ERP platform’s capabilities in these spaces. Or implement low-cost, smaller-footprint solutions – even if on an exploratory basis. If they are fully adopted later, you can integrate them into the ERP backbone and expose standardized data and processes to the edge.”

from Deloitte’s Tech Trends 2011 report titled “the end of the “Death of ERP” 

So, what does this mean for your business?  It means you need to consider all the possibilities.

First, evaluate cloud-based options, and balance features with cost, time-to-value, and operational requirements.

Then, selectively innovate.  Figure out which areas of the business give you a competitive differentiation and innovate in those areas.

The traditional thinking, which is in line with the traditional ERP approach, is that all of the business functionality has to be incorporated into a single platform solution.  This is certainly no longer the case, and businesses are finding that they now have an ability to take advantage of the benefits of their existing systems while extending and innovating through the use of cloud services.